CPUnk I write right. Right? Aye.

3Feb/101

Filth

As I’m approach­ing the com­ing trip to Africa, I’m reminded of all the things I don’t do well — main­tain my patience, avoid lust­ful thoughts, ignore judg­men­tal think­ing — all the behav­iors that attempt to under­mine my con­fi­dence in my own right­eous­ness.  But wait a sec­ond … what right­eous­ness?!?!  Who ever said I was righteous?

In his let­ter to the Corinthian church (a church that was strut­ting in its own right­eous­ness), the Apos­tle Paul writes about him­self to the church:

“We are fools for Christ, but you are so wise in Christ! We are weak, but you are strong! You are hon­ored, we are dis­hon­ored! To this very hour we go hun­gry and thirsty, we are in rags, we are bru­tally treated, we are home­less. We work hard with our own hands. When we are cursed, we bless; when we are per­se­cuted, we endure it; when we are slan­dered, we answer kindly. Up to this moment we have become the scum of the earth, the refuse of the world.”
(1Corinthians 4:10–13 NIV)

He is point­ing, quite clearly, to the lowly degra­da­tions that the world has placed upon the face of Paul and his fel­low mis­sion­ar­ies, the ways that (with a voice of sar­casm) he is not being as right­eous and per­fect as the peo­ple in the church at Corinth.

His point, and mine, is that we are not to judge the right­eous­ness of someone’s soul (or our own) by what we expe­ri­ence in the world; instead we are to rec­og­nize that we are made right­eous by God and God alone in Christ — that the very fact that we are walk­ing piles of filth, filled with ire and desire, judg­ment and doubt is a tes­ti­mony to the power of God when He uses us in spite of that.

I know quite a few really Godly peo­ple … they’re awe­some and they do lovely things with their lives.  I also have seen just about all of them do some really “human” things.  This does not undo the right­eous­ness of what they accom­plish, it actu­ally enhances it — because I know, when I regard them in my heart and mem­ory, the mirac­u­lous work they do is not because they’ve become super-human right­eous­ness heroes … but because, in the midst of all the noise in their lives — inside and out — they strive to lis­ten to God and do what He tells them … and through that, they are included in the things that God is doing.  We are Saved in Christ, but we are not sud­denly per­fect peo­ple… we are per­fectly imperfect.

When I see a right­eous friend help­ing change the world, I know that per­son isn’t doing it — I know that God is mov­ing behind that per­son, doing it all Him­self in spite of that person’s “brokenness.”

I’m not a fan of that word, bro­ken­ness.  Chris­tians sling it around to talk about their own fallen nature — almost as a euphemism for sin.  I think it’s a bit pedan­tic — child­ishly describ­ing our open-faced defi­ance of Deity as if we’re a toy that can be mended.  Let us be clear — left to our own mys­ti­cal, spir­i­tual devices — float­ing in the Matrix-esque ether of eter­nity, defined only by our­selves … we would all be over­weight throne sit­ters, hold­ing scepters of judg­ment, naked in our own glut­tony and desires, drift­ing around in a stu­por of self-indulgence while point­ing at each other in judg­ment — seek­ing to destroy that which we don’t like and con­sume that which we like.  We’re not bro­ken … we’re evil.  (“Speak for your­self, Mal­colm; I’m a good per­son.”  Well I guess that’s Paul’s point, isn’t it?)

Given that, no won­der we seek our own right­eous­ness in Chris­tian­ity — no won­der that we seek to be free of such a fat and ugly pic­ture and do “good” as much as we can … who wants to be a lust-filled con­sumer our entire lives? (besides our friends on Madi­son Avenue)  So, upon receiv­ing the Sal­va­tion of Christ, the Promise of Redemp­tion to a truly Holier exis­tence in God — we seek to embrace it.  Like the vomit cov­ered alco­holic who quickly jumps up from the gut­ter, tucks in his grimy shirt and combs his greasy hair as the queen approaches, we stand up and do our best to make our­selves pre­sentable.  Of course, since we’re pathetic — we then look at all the other home­less drunks around us that are straight­en­ing up and judge them because their shirts are ripped and they have smears of filth on their faces.

But, if we are to be truly Right­eous, the first step is to be truly true.  We are to rec­og­nize that while we are Redeemed in Christ, we’re still stinky; we’re to see that even the queen (“hey, you fat cow, nice hat”) is filthy before the Lord, and it is the fact that He can use such a rag­tag bunch of mal­con­tents for Good that proves His Divin­ity — God is God and we are not.

So, as much as I want to head to Africa and share Divine Inspi­ra­tion about the things I have learned to help them move for­ward as Chris­t­ian Busi­ness peo­ple — what I really want to do is impress all of you.  I want every­one who reads this to say, “Wow, check Mal­colm out, he’s going all the way to Africa to teach Pas­tors and busi­ness peo­ple things about busi­ness.  God must really love him.”  I want you all to be impressed by what God is doing and see that yes, I have accom­plished some seri­ous level of junior Right­eous­ness — and well, it’s ok… because I’m hum­ble.  I want you all to shut up and lis­ten to me, because I can hear God… then maybe, just maybe, the world will be a bet­ter place.

Thank­fully, God doesn’t really do it that way — in spite of how awe­some I secretly am in my own mind — He uses me.  Not because of any­thing I’m doing that’s right­eous (hey, what’s this stain on my tie?  Is that puke?), but because — for what­ever rea­son HE chooses, He has decided to Love me… in all my squalid splendor.

These peo­ple are wait­ing to hear me tell them things — but it really IS God doing the teach­ing.  Not because I’m a “ves­sel for His Divine Word” … but because I’m the self-indulgent, self-important, self-righteous ham­mer that He chose today to drive that nail today.

But you know what?  I’m really, truly com­forted by that.  You see, if I am only respon­si­ble for being a stinky pile of self-involvement … well … I know I can han­dle THAT!  Since God is really the one doing the work here, I get to be a spec­ta­tor; and if I get “lost in the shuf­fle” and sud­denly am con­cerned about whether I’m doing a right­eous thing or not — I don’t have to reach for that fake para­chute of “per­fect­ness” that I hope is enough … I can fall over in the pool of my own awful­ness and let God drive.  How awe­some is that?  I get to watch all this cool stuff hap­pen — I get to smile when peo­ple say nice things to me, and if I sud­denly find myself wan­der­ing in the sit­u­a­tion — all I gotta do is find my lesser per­son and I’ll be ok.  Woot.

Yes, we ARE made more right­eous in the Lord (this would lead to an entire dia­log on expi­a­tion and pro­pi­ti­a­tion of sin, for those of you with score­cards), and of course we are Sanc­ti­fied in the Lord! (Praise Jesus for His Divine Sac­ri­fice!)   But most of all, even though we are wit­ness to our lives becom­ing much more pure in our actions and moti­va­tions — we are never called to be Per­fect our­selves … we are called to be LIKE Jesus, not be Him our­selves.  So, when the going gets rough, puke and fall over, baby.

I’m filth … plain and sim­ple … but, after all, God makes things grow out of filth every day — He does so by plant­ing His seed in the soil and tend­ing it Him­self.  Can the decay­ing rot take pride in the orchard?  Not directly, the filth did not make the seed.  Can the decay­ing rot be glad in its use­ful­ness?  I’ll let you know later…

  • Share/Bookmark
21Jan/100

My Chair matches my desk — I’m no longer fighting with one hand

In my study at home, I have a huge desk, it’s at least six feet wide and prob­a­bly 4 feet deep, it’s about 3 feet tall, it’s vast and made of wood — I love it.

Unfor­tu­nately, I haven’t had a chair that fits it and keeps my back from being destroyed in the process.  I spent at least two years seek­ing a solu­tion.  Since I’m 6’5″ I tend to need big­ger stuff — but all the “good” chairs are just too small.

So, at one point, I brought my Aeron chair home, think­ing that it would be able to answer the prob­lem, to bring the chair expe­ri­ence home for me.  But it was too short!!!

Well, not to be defeated, Hillary and I went to the Aeron store in Seat­tle — and they explained that the two inches I needed weren’t pos­si­ble — that my chair could be 20″ tall, or I could get the 23.5″ tall chair — but there’s no 22″ chair… sorry.

Ok — fast for­ward — I found a guy through a friend who has a fac­tory — I planned to send the pis­ton to him while I’m in Africa and have him make the changes nec­es­sary, basi­cally man­u­fac­ture my own pis­ton to fit, because I’m a solu­tion kind of guy.  Mean­while, the pis­ton also hap­pened to be bro­ken slightly (noth­ing dra­matic, a miss­ing washer), so Kathy called Her­man Miller, who has a war­ranty pro­gram that would replace the piston.

So — here’s the plan — we get the repair guy to come, replace the pis­ton, we send the busted one to the guy with the fac­tory, he mod­i­fies that one, we swap it out — all while I’m in Africa.  I come home, chair joy.  Got it?  (Part of the rea­son we planned that is because Kathy sits in this chair at night when we do snack­view­ing together).

Then the repair guy says, basi­cally, “Well — why don’t I just put a bet­ter pis­ton in there?  The Euro­pean model is taller.”

Umm… what?  So for almost a year, Her­man Miller has let me twist in the wind because they don’t know about the Euro­pean pis­ton?  Arg.

Ok — fast for­ward again … The chair is refit­ted, has big­ger cast­ers also, so it’s a really nice fit.  I’m sit­ting at the desk right now, using the big com­puter that I haven’t been able to use because I can’t sit here for any extended period of time with­out hurt­ing my back.

…so this got me to thinking…

I really feel like I’ve been liv­ing with one hand tied behind my back as far as pro­duc­tiv­ity goes, for a very long time.  Way back in the day, we lived in Kingston, which was basi­cally 2.5 hours round-trip from the office with ferry and car — so I was work­ing from a major distance…

Then we moved here to Bain­bridge, and my study was in pieces parts for at least a year, then Kathy helped me get it bet­ter and we got this great desk … and even that didn’t work.  So I was in lap­top mode for years.

Now — the pos­i­tive fruit of all of this is that, dur­ing those times, I’ve become a mas­ter ninja road-warrior.  I’m so dialed in from a lap­top remotely that I don’t even con­sider it mobile office — it’s just life in our right­eous com­pany (hey, team mates, you rock).

But, iron­i­cally, the lap­top makes paper­work tough in some ways — because I don’t really have a way to review paper, process mail, etc.

That hap­pens at the office in Seat­tle, of course — but more often than not — I’m highly dig­i­tal, and any visual project that involves paper (e.g. edit­ing, markup, sketch­ing, etc.) wasn’t hap­pen­ing well from here because well — I sit in a chair with a lap­top (which also has a small screen).

The pos­i­tive of that, of course, is I’m not able to print from any­where in the uni­verse to the office, and we do every­thing with scans and digital.

But now, I have a chair at my “power desk” — the one at home where all the stuff is as I want it, in the room where I get things done.  My desk works, my desk­top com­puter is huge (and is cur­rently play­ing that 70s retro Jamiro­quai hit “Cos­mic Girl”) and … I’m now fight­ing with two hands.

This could be fun.

  • Share/Bookmark
Filed under: Business, General No Comments
10Dec/090

Signing up for the GMAT — or why I may hate Kaplan

I am study­ing for the GMAT in prepa­ra­tion for pos­si­bly apply­ing to busi­ness school.

Since I’m dry on my alge­bra (a squared minus 2ab plus b squared equals what?!!!) — I fig­ured it would be a very good idea for me to get a tutor… so I chose Kaplan, which is a nation­ally rec­og­nized test prep com­pany.  The jury is still out on whether that was a good idea.

Three weeks ago, I paid my fees, which were not insub­stan­tial, to get going on my tutor­ing.  The peo­ple at the Kaplan cen­ter (in the Uni­ver­sity Dis­trict), were nice enough — and they told me to come in for a diag­nos­tic test.

Cool — will do… I drove there in my truck, spent a long time try­ing to find a hole to cram my long-bed F-150 into around that school — and then went to take the paper test.

Please, sit right here, and fill out this bub­ble sheet.  Awe­some — I love me some bub­ble sheet… just like the old days.  Mind you, now the tests are all done by com­puter — and there are major dif­fer­ences in that … but for the diag­nos­tic, no prob­lem … I’ll just sit here in this room with these other peo­ple who are also tak­ing diagnostics.

Like this nice man next to me … who seems to need to talk to his friend in the next cubi­cle… oh wait — they’re just dis­cussing how to plug in his lap­top — using the power port on the other side of my cubi­cle … no — that’s fine — please run your power line across my feet — that’s ok … oh, am I dis­turb­ing you?  Mak­ing too much quiet and intrud­ing on your talk­ing?  Sorry … I’m just tak­ing a TEST!

Get up … head down the hall of the KAPLAN cen­ter in Seat­tle (have I men­tioned that this pain is from Kaplan?) — and get to the front desk.

“Excuse me, I’m sorry … but well — there’s two men hav­ing a con­ver­sa­tion in the test room?“
“What?!  Oh, I’m so sorry — we hate when they do that … let’s go up there and make them stop.”

Up we go.

“Excuse me, sir,”, said the nice young lady, “you really can’t talk in here.“
“What? I am with the mak­ing of talk?  I do not under­stand why for you are say­ing this to me.  Tell me, other man to whom I have been speak­ing, what is this she is say­ing.  Here, let me hang my head in shame, we will not speak loudly any­more — only softly.”

She turns to me.  “Would you like to fin­ish your test some­where else?”

“Yes.  Yes, I would.”

So, I head to one of the class­rooms (I am sorry, my friend — I was just about to use this for my noon-time prayer? Oh.  Sure.  I’ll keep mov­ing) … get to a room and start work­ing on my test.

In comes a guy to eat his lunch.  He’s quiet though — all is well.

Oh — wait — lis­ten to THAT.  The gig­gling, shriek­ing, laugh­ing, shout­ing, crazed stu­dents who don’t real­ize other peo­ple exist are run­ning up and down the hall­ways (all 20 of them) play­ing slap and tickle between the girls and the boys.  Isn’t that FUN???? Have I men­tioned that this is hap­pen­ing at the KAPLAN cen­ter in Seattle?

Well — what­ever, it’s only a diag­nos­tic any­way.  I did ok for no sleep, this sort of envi­ron­ment, and no prep (which was the sane plan — want a good diag­nos­tic of my “z” game as I called it).

So, I fin­ished that — got my score later (after a few bugs and hic­cups on the web­site that are too bor­ing, but stu­pid, to describe) — and they planned to get me a tutor.  At this point, it’s Novem­ber 18th or thereabouts.

Hav­ing dis­cussed the sit­u­a­tion with the tutor­ing coor­di­na­tor at the KAPLAN cen­ter in Seat­tle, I indi­cated that I was likely going to want to take the test in mid-December, so I can take it AGAIN if some­thing goes bad.  So, the coor­di­na­tor is under the impres­sion that I’m gong to take the test in mid-December, remem­ber that.

Well, a week later, I reach out and he’s indi­cated that the really good tutor might be able to wedge me into her sched­ule — awe­some.  She and I con­nect, and start talk­ing about sched­ules.  She’s under the impres­sion that my sched­ule is very inflex­i­ble, and that I have to start my test­ing in mid-December — so we bet­ter get at it!

But after we talk — we both real­ize that if I sign up for the Ulti­mate Prac­tice Test (a full-drill true test expe­ri­ence at the test cen­ter, sans real grade), we could see how I’m doing, so I can actu­ally sched­ule against my required due date, which is Jan­u­ary 8, 2010.  Mid-December was my home-made “prac­tice test” — but since they have this awe­some thing avail­able, the UPT, she and I can coor­di­nate a bet­ter sched­ule.  Super!

But she can’t start until Decem­ber 8, bogus.  But that’s ok — it’s worth it, we work it out, super.

Finally, Decem­ber 8 comes around.  She’s great — her name is Cat — really great, lov­ing it.  Her first day with me, she tells me that at this late date, I really should sign up for my actual test and the UPT — now!  Oh.  I was under the impres­sion there was plenty of time… and nobody said any­thing to me any­way … and hey, aren’t they under the impres­sion that I’m test­ing mid-December?  What?!!!

So I head to www.mba.com (blech) … and rapidly go to sign up on Decem­ber 9, 2009.

Fill out lots of intru­sive infor­ma­tion (Are you white?  Are you mar­ried?  How much money do you make?) … and then sub­mit your profile.

“Thank you for sub­mit­ting your pro­file.  You won’t be able to sign up for two busi­ness days while we process your pro­file… but here’s access to the things you can’t do yet.”

Umm… what?  Ok — let me call in.

“Hi, thanks for call­ing — it’ll take you 20 min­utes to answer our ques­tions — why don’t you just go online?”

What?!! I … what?  Seri­ously?  Ok — whatever.

Fol­low­ing day (today).  Email arrives.

“Thanks for sign­ing up for mba.com … you’re cleared to sign up for tests and stuff.”

Great.

So I head to the web­site to sign up.  Phew.  let’s take a look at the first week in January.

“Sorry, every­thing is just about booked — you can have an 8am test in one of these locations.”

Arg!  What?  8am?  In the morning?

Ok — well … let’s … oh, what’s this but­ton do?  Shows all avail­able for the week?  That’s inter­est­ing… click.

Mys­te­ri­ously, a time slot for 12pm on Jan­u­ary 8 appears (woot!)

Click THAT baby!

“Thank you for select­ing your time.  Would you like your scores sent online, or online and by mail?  Would you like your reports sent online?  Would you like your sched­ule sent online?”

Hmm… I think I’d most likely like to get the scores online and in the mail… that makes sense.  Let me think about these other ones.  I guess … oh, I’ll just leave the defaults — that’s ok.

“Thank you for mak­ing your selec­tions.  Please enter your credit card information.”

Rum­mage, rum­mage — where’s my credit card… ahh — ok … type type type … there you go, mba.com.

“Your sched­uled appoint­ment isn’t com­plete yet!  Please con­firm the infor­ma­tion below, check the ‘I accept’ but­ton, and then continue.”

Sure — no prob­lem.  I accept.  Click.

“I’m sorry — that time is no longer avail­able, please sched­ule another time.”

What??!!!!! The extra 2 min­utes I took to fill out your forms lost my seat?  Are you kid­ding me?

Ok, ok ok … give me 8AM.

Final­ize order.  Begin email to my tutor (the only con­tact I have at Kaplan).

“Hey!  Arg.  Nobody told me (for the three weeks I was in con­tact with Kaplan) that I should sign up for my test.  I’m barely squeak­ing in at 8am — this sucks.  Why didn’t any­body tell me?!!!”

Ok … well, she had instructed me to sign up for the UPT a week prior to the actual exam.

Umm… how do I do that.

Head to KAPLAN.  Look at my syl­labus.  In there is a line about sign­ing up for the UPT.  Click.

“Here’s an expla­na­tion of how you need to do this.  We don’t have any per­ti­nent data for you — just an expla­na­tion that you need to do this.  Over at mba.com/kaplan.  Have a nice day.”

arg… ok … mba.com/kaplan

“Please fill out your information”

Mr. … Mal­colm … Mead … etc…

“Have you taken this test before? [yes/no] … please include your KaplanID”

No. Click.

“You can­not pro­ceed with­out a KaplanID, which you will find in your syllabus.”

Um… what?

Ok — flip back over to KAPLAN.

“You have to fill out your UPT appli­ca­tion at mba.com/kaplan — you’ll need your KaplanID, which you will find above this section.”

Above this sec­tion?  I’m on a pop-up page … there’s no above here … this is all there is?

Email tutor:

“Arg … how do I find my KaplanID?  This is insane.  Why is this so painful?  I’m really pretty ticked off now. –Malcolm”

Check my email records — ahhh… here’s my receipt with my Enroll­ment ID … phew.

Back to mba.com

Copy/Paste.

“I’m sorry — that’s not a valid KaplanID — you will need to find it in your syllabus.”

Back to syl­labus (at this point I have about 6 or 7 win­dows open slam­ming back and forth try­ing to find info).

Oh — thank God!  Here’s some­thing marked “infor­ma­tion about sign­ing up for your UPT”

Click.

In the janki­est plain-text look­ing puke lan­guage pos­si­ble (read, writ­ten by a coder, not a web-developer), is a para­graph that bab­bles about tak­ing steps .. and here’s your KaplanID (which is some­thing like 12012398230.asadf23423).

Copy/Paste into mba.com

“Thank you for reg­is­ter­ing for your UPT.  What dates would you like?”

Jan­u­ary 1, or thereabouts.

“I’m sorry — we don’t have any­thing avail­able on those dates, nor do we have any­thing avail­able where you will be tak­ing your actual test.  Here are some 8am tests slots in other test cen­ters … ha ha … you should have applied sooner, you over­charged loser.”

Great… umm…

grrrr.…

Skip it.  Write another email to the tutor.

“What is the MATTER with these peo­ple?  Arg! –Malcolm”

Get home — fully amped.  Feel­ing agi­tated and mis­er­able because of KAPLAN.

Kathy tries to hose me down — no good … gotta lock myself in the study.  Get away from her and the kids — no inno­cent bystanders.

Fume, rage, fume, rage … call 1800-KAP-TEST

“Thank you for call­ing — please nav­i­gate an ardu­ously long-winded voice­mail tree.”

Beep — boop — beep.

“Thank you for call­ing — your call is impor­tant to us.  Your call will be directed to the next avail­able operator.”

*click*

What?  Hello?  What?!

GRRRR!!!!!

Call 1800KRAP-TEST again.

“Thank you for call­ing — please nav­i­gate an ardu­ously long-winded voice­mail tree.”

Beep — boop — mistakeboop.

*click*

SERIOUSLY?!!!!

Call again!

“Thank you for call­ing — please nav­i­gate an ardu­ously long-winded voice­mail tree.”

Beep — boop — beep.

“Thank you for call­ing — your call is impor­tant to us.  Your call will be directed to the next avail­able operator.”

Wait … wait …

Real per­son, “Hello, thank you for call­ing Kaplan.  Our offices are closed right now — would you like me to take a mes­sage for you?”

“Yes please?  I’d like to file a complaint.”

“Oh, ok — please describe the com­plaint?  What’s your phone number?”

I give all the info — hang up.

Let’s go check mba.com again — because I’m twisted.

Sched­ule GMAT — click

Review avail­able dates.

“There is a slot open in North­gate on Jan­u­ary 8, 2010 at 12pm”

WOOT!  Scream out loud — “Honey, help!  I need my wal­let RIGHT NOW … run!”

Kathy comes run­ning in, grabs my wal­let — I reach over and pull every­thing out of it onto the floor, scat­ter­ing it across the floor “just get the gray card — get it now!”

She hands me the card.

Type fast — fly fin­gers fly!

Click — yes, I’ll choose defaults for deliv­er­ies — here’s my card infor­ma­tion — sub­mit request … oops, didn’t click the “I accept” ok — check the box — click!  Woot … it’s saying…

“I’m sorry, you already have a test sched­uled on this date — you can­not sched­ule two tests on the same date.”

AAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGHHHHH!!!! (I think I actu­ally said that as I screamed across the house).

I screamed enough that Kathy came over from the din­ner table qui­etly and closed the doors to the study.

I was just try­ing to resched­ule — where do I do THAT?!!!!

Find an innocu­ous link called “View Appoint­ment Activ­ity” — what­ever THAT means.

Oh — there’s my reg­is­tered 8am … it has a resched­ule but­ton!  Woot!

Click resched­ule.  What’s your avail­abil­ity for Jan­u­ary 8?

“I’m sorry — 12pm is not avail­able on that date.  Would you like 8am?”

Ok … for those that know me — I’d just like to point out that I did not throw either my phone, nor my lap­top at this moment.

I just screamed — a lot… in a room with closed doors.

No pro­fan­ity though — just screaming.

Defeat.

Despair.

Leave the room — go to din­ner.  I’m recall­ing that I bumped into the avail­able 12pm because I’d expanded my search to include Ore­gon and Canada — the 12pm is still in North­gate — but I had seen it due to des­per­a­tion is all.

Din­ner is over.  Chris calls.

“Hey man — how’s it going?”, he asks.

“Pain … suf­fer­ing… despair — you?”

“Just work­ing.”

I aim­lessly nav­i­gate mba.com — see­ing if I can find that resched­ule but­ton again — maybe over the next week I can just poke and poke and poke at it — like at Tick­et­mas­ter for a good show.

Oh — right, it’s eas­ily found under “View Appoint­ment Activity”

Chat­ting with Chris.

Resched­ule — click.

“There is an appoint­ment avail­able at 12pm at North­gate on Jan­u­ary 8″

At this point, I think what Chris hears is some­thing like:

“Ohmigodohmigodohmigod … dude — I can’t explain — just can’t talk — I gotta do some­thing … where is it?  Gotta get it — I need my card … I can’t explain man — gotta move fast … look out!”

Chris described it later as sound­ing like I was play­ing an online video game.

Well — I scored the 12pm slot on Jan­u­ary 8, 2010 … only cost me an extra $50 for the resched­ule (an hour later).

Should I hate KAPLAN cen­ter in Seat­tle?  I’m not sure yet.  They should have told me to reg­is­ter weeks ago.

I mean … what if I actu­ally was tak­ing the test in mid-December?

  • Share/Bookmark
Filed under: Business, Dumb, General No Comments
4Aug/090

Watch out — deep thoughts

So — I’ve been pon­der­ing “the big top” prob­lem in this life.  That’s when you look up from where you are, finan­cially, socially, career-wise, what­ever — and you real­ize that you’re still in the seats, that there are some rare and impos­si­bly gifted peo­ple fly­ing way up high at the top of life, and there’s not much you can do to get there besides leave your seat and just go for it… but you’re get­ting older, the rules keep you from try­ing, and frankly — it’s scary.

I’ve watched movies about the inor­di­nately wealthy, I’ve read books about the pow­er­ful, I’ve seen a lot of things that show the incred­i­ble void that peo­ple feel when they’re actu­ally at the top … the feel­ing of being absolutely lost in their own riches — and basi­cally for­got­ten by every­one else.

Most inor­di­nately rich and pow­er­ful peo­ple don’t have many (or any) friends, for exam­ple.  They tend to be highly iso­lated and “left alone” because that’s what they’ve wanted and that’s what most peo­ple think that the inor­di­nately wealthy and pow­er­ful want.

In fact, they become enslaved to the skills, luck, drive, art or what­ever it is that got them there — the world machine grabs them and dri­ves them — forces them to stay at what they’re doing — or it will take all their riches away.

They acquire more — accom­plish more, get more tro­phies, awards, vic­to­ries, con­tracts or what­ever and find them­selves wak­ing up to do the same thing over and over — because they do it well — and it’s what peo­ple expect of them.

Yes — they attend beau­ti­ful par­ties — but the par­ties are just made up of peo­ple that have tal­ent, power, riches, strength — and they all get to look at each other across the void and real­ize that they’re all just nor­mal peo­ple in very strange lives.

If they are blessed, they have fam­ily — that’s a key to not self-destructing.  They might have a friend from before their suc­cess that they can trust — but over­all … they are alone with their art, gift, power, strength, majesty.

In the big top, the trapeze plat­form is very, very small.  Peo­ple tend to avoid mak­ing you angry up there — they tend to approach you care­fully, they tend to do and say what­ever they think it is you want to hear, even when you tell them what you want to hear is the truth.  They unin­ten­tion­ally iso­late you because they don’t want you to exer­cise your power on them, which you can do at any time.

So these peo­ple end up with boats, jets, houses, cars, par­ties, travel, resorts and all the other trap­pings — and it ends up mean­ing less and less to them … they don’t care.

The point is that there’s noth­ing of value in things.  Put all your focus on sat­is­fac­tion.  Keep your­self fed, have enough to drink, and be sat­is­fied in what you do in life.  If you do that, you escape the big top completely.

To bur­den the metaphor — that’s when you get to see the sky, which of course has no lim­its at all.

  • Share/Bookmark
17Oct/080

Can this Umbrella Stop my Fall?

Money is fake. Get that through your head — it’s not real, it’s hardly even paper these days. Money isn’t real — it’s credit.
You take your money, put it in a bank, they make a record of it — based on the trust that they are accu­rate — you have credit to pur­chase things up to the amount you have stored in the bank.
If they bank believes in you, it offers you money from the future of your life so you can buy big­ger things now. That’s what you think of as credit, but is just mon­e­ti­za­tion of your exist­ing credit bear­ing abil­ity.
Now, if you take money from you in the future, it’s a pretty dumb thing to spend it on things that don’t retain value. Like just about every­thing in your house, your car, and every­thing you con­sume. If you’re rob­bing your­self from the future to buy things that don’t retain value — you’re basi­cally mak­ing your­self poor in the future.
See — you can’t make more than you’re going to make in your life — that’s the limit. Every­thing you will ever make is what you’ll make. So, if you take $1,000 from next year and eat it now, next year, you’ll be $1,000 behind.
PLUS, you’ll have to pay the peo­ple who pulled that time warp for you — that’s inter­est. So, not only have you taken that money from you in the future, you’re also tak­ing money from you again to pay the peo­ple who lend you that future fund­ing.
So what can you put your money INTO? There’s only one thing you should put your money in — PAY ATTENTION …
Things that retain value. That’s it. Every­thing else is noise.
What kinds of things retain value?
A house, for the most part, even with this cri­sis, retains value or will recover value after the cri­sis is over.
Real estate, raw dirt of the Earth itself — retains value.
Stocks in sta­ble com­pa­nies retain value.
But how, Mal­colm, do I find stocks in sta­ble com­pa­nies? Well, that’s the trick isn’t it?
Squint into the future — what com­pa­nies will most likely still be here? Coke? IBM? Google? Who knows — that’s up to you … but when you put your money in those things that retain value … you don’t lose it.
The trick is to find those. Not big mondo super stocks that will grow and make you rich — just ones that won’t tank.
…oh, and btw — stop tak­ing money from your future — leave it there — you’ll need it.

  • Share/Bookmark
Filed under: Business No Comments
26Sep/080

The Financial Debacle — an Explanation in Layman’s Terms

HOW YOU CAN HELP: DECREASE YOUR CREDIT CARD DEBT
The fol­low­ing is an expla­na­tion of what’s hap­pen­ing for intel­li­gent peo­ple who don’t track this stuff — in the form of an anal­ogy:
There’s a fic­tional town called “Carville”, where the major­ity of peo­ple sell new and used cars. All the out­ly­ing towns come to Carville to buy cars, because the mar­ket is great for cars there — since that’s where everyone’s sell­ing their used cars.
Between 2002 and 2007, the five largest car deal­ers, Al’s Autos, Bob’s Beau­ties, Charlie’s Cars, Diane’s Diesels, and Eddie’s Engines, were going gang­busters. They were expand­ing their inven­tory, buy­ing up used cars left and right, and even load­ing a lot of these cars into trucks and sell­ing them in lots to smaller car deal­ers; that was stan­dard pro­ce­dure — the smaller deal­ers would buy these lots from the ABC deal­ers (that’s what they were called) and the smaller deal­ers would turn around and sell these “whole­sale” cars at higher prices.
Now the Carville town gov­ern­ment had a require­ment of all sell­ers. You could only sell cars if you kept at least 1 new car, or equiv­a­lent, per 100 used cars. The “or equiv­a­lent” was a rule our lit­tle town’s mayor made that said any car worth $15,000 or more was con­sid­ered a new car equiv­a­lent.
Based on that, the ABC deal­ers always kept a por­tion of their cars as new and equiv­a­lents, so that they could sell all those cheap used cars that were mov­ing like hot­cakes. The deal­ers even sold car lots to each other based on this sort of new car require­ment — so some­times, overnight, Al would call Diane and say “Diane, I’m short two new cars for what I have on hand, will you sell me a pair of new cars at whole­sale?”, and she’d agree — since Al had 98 new cars in hand for the 10,000 used cars he was hold­ing. She’d charge him a small fee, and everyone’s happy — no prob­lem there, stan­dard busi­ness.
Now, some­one real­ized that if you took apart 10 used cars and put the nicest pieces back together again, you’d end up with an “equiv­a­lent to new” car — one that could be counted as part of your new car require­ment. So the ABC deal­ers, since they had the most cars, started chop­ping used cars as they came in and mak­ing these higher value “equiv­a­lent to new” cars — which was cheaper than buy­ing actual new cars — how great is that?!
Before you know it, they’re not only mak­ing these “chopped new” cars for them­selves, they’re sell­ing them to each other for equiv­a­lency head­counts as well, and sell­ing them to smaller deal­ers as well — there’s a whole new kind of car here, and frankly since the value of a chopped new is so much higher than the pieces it’s made out of, the ABC deal­ers were focus­ing on chopped new cars a great deal.
For five years, it’s a wild ride. They real­ize that they can go after cheaper and cheaper used cars, chop them into just barely equiv­a­lent cars, and actu­ally cre­ate MASSIVE inven­to­ries of new or equiv­a­lent cars, so they can go out and get tremen­dous amounts of used cars — just vast lots — Al went from 10,000 used cars and 100 new cars to 200,000 used cars and 2000 (!) “chopped new” cars. He was buy­ing and sell­ing car lots to folks as far away as Indi­ana — mak­ing money hand over fist … and nobody ever expected it to end — because it wasn’t some bub­ble, it was just a great way of doing busi­ness.
Then one day, there was a car acci­dent — and one of the dri­vers was dri­ving a chopped new car. In the acci­dent, the chopped new broke into pieces and the dri­ver was severely injured. Peo­ple at first didn’t notice, until more chopped new cars started break­ing apart in car acci­dents. See, chopped new cars were great for reg­u­lar use, but they actu­ally were ter­ri­ble in a cri­sis — they col­lapsed like a card­board car, and peo­ple were get­ting hurt badly.
All of the sud­den, nobody wants to buy chopped new cars. They’re dan­ger­ous, they go bad at the worst pos­si­ble moment and can’t sur­vive a crash. So the chopped new cars lost their value. Well … that meant they were no longer equiv­a­lent to a new car — heck, they weren’t even equiv­a­lent to a used car. They were rolling junk, worth noth­ing.
So on a dark Mon­day morn­ing, the ABC deal­ers went out and looked at their vast fields of cars, and real­ized they had a major prob­lem. They had mas­sive counts of used cars (remem­ber Al’s 200,000 used cars?) and only a hand­ful of new or equiv­a­lent cars. So first, they called each other.
Al called Diane and asked if she had any new cars she could sell him at whole­sale — she replied that she was just about to call him and ask the same thing … or would he like to buy a few lots of used cars so she can drum up the money needed to get the new cars she needed? Well, nobody had enough new cars. In fact, all of Carville had maybe 150 real new cars and close to 1,000,000 used cars on hand. Nobody was going to be able to afford the tens of thou­sands of new cars needed to keep Carville alive. Now what?
So — here’s the anal­ogy explained:
* Carville is the Finan­cial Indus­try
* Each of the ABC deal­ers is a major Invest­ment Bank (Mor­gan Stan­ley, Gold­man Sachs, Bear Stearns, Lehman Broth­ers, and Mer­rill Lynch)
* The new car or new car equiv­a­lents is “Assets on Hand” — this is a require­ment that the Gov­ern­ment and lenders have for how much money you must have on hand before you can lend, or bor­row money. Clearly, when you go to get a loan, the bank asks you what you have for col­lat­eral — but what you may not know is that the Gov­ern­ment won’t let banks lend money unless they have a cer­tain amount in cash or cash equiv­a­lents — assets. These restric­tions are lower for Invest­ment banks — but “reg­u­lar” (or com­mer­cial) banks have very strict require­ments for how much cash on hand they must hold. (See Reserve Require­ments explained for more details)
* The used cars is the loans and other MONEY MAKING meth­ods all these banks and Invest­ment houses had out there. It’s the equiv­a­lent of how many things in your house you’ve bought on credit vs. with cash. Imag­ine if most of your entire home is bought on credit (if that’s the case, stop read­ing and fix that now) — that’s how “lever­aged” the banks got. Well, that’s how lever­aged they tend to be in gen­eral — but in this case the “ABC deal­ers” were bas­ing it on these crazy “chopped new” cars … which are…
* The “Chop New” cars are the CDOs (See Col­lat­er­al­ized Debt Oblig­a­tions for more details) that the Finan­cial Indus­try (“Carville”) was sling­ing around as if they were real assets (“new car equiv­a­lents”). The CDOs basi­cally are an arm­ful of debt — and the big mon­ster in this case is con­sumer debt, in the form of crazy sub-prime mort­gages (Mort­gage Backed Secu­ri­ties aka MBSs) wrapped up with a bow and treated basi­cally like money. That’s great, until we start see­ing…
* The car crashes are when indi­vid­u­als started default­ing on their con­sumer debt. These defaults were get­ting more fre­quent — which forced the Finan­cial Indus­try to review the MBSs and real­ize that these MBS “chopped new” cars fell apart in a finan­cial cri­sis — indi­vid­u­als with low credit rat­ings had been scoop­ing up vast amounts of debt, being put into these CDO/MBS secu­ri­ties — which were then sold to the major banks. When all the bad con­sumer debtors started default­ing on their crazy loans (those “half-caff with a twist” super sub prime ARM cheater mort­gages that sane peo­ple avoided), those indi­vid­ual loans made the CDOs that had them bun­dled, into garbage. All of the sud­den…
*The major invest­ment firms real­ized they had mas­sive amounts of loans out there, and their assets were next to noth­ing — they had no cap­i­tal, they couldn’t match Reserve Require­ments (where applic­a­ble) — and all they had were giant piles of these use­less CDO/MBSs filled with default­ing debt.
So what hap­pened?
Well, to date of this post — the mayor and gov­ern­ment of Carville real­ized they had to buy all these “chopped new” cars from the deal­ers, or all of Carville would fall. The hope is that the Mayor’s peo­ple can fix the chopped new cars, or at least hold them long enough for the good ones to be worth some­thing again.
“But that’s going to cost the town $700 Bil­lion”, some­one shouted.
“Well,”, said the Mayor’s banker, “if we don’t do some­thing, there won’t be any more cars to sell, and frankly, with­out cars, nobody can drive, and if you can’t drive, the farm­ers can’t sell their goods, peo­ple can’t get to the store, and the whole sky will fall. Folks will be trapped on their own farms, liv­ing off the land. We gotta do some­thing.“
…and where it stands right now is that the Mayor, his banker, and the town elders are all sit­ting down to fig­ure out how to get this money avail­able to the car deal­ers so they can get back to sell­ing cars, and unwind this mess.
What hap­pened to the ABC deal­ers?
* Lehman Broth­ers (let’s say that’s Al), failed. They’ve filed bank­ruptcy pro­tec­tion (they’re not closed, they’re just say­ing they can’t pay any of their cred­i­tors and need pro­tec­tion until they recover, you’ll see them again)
* Mer­rill Lynch (Diane) found a neigh­bor, who never got a big piece of the “chopped new” busi­ness. See, that neigh­bor is a truck deal­er­ship — and they’re required to have many more new trucks per used truck (let’s say 10 new trucks per 100 used trucks vs. 1 new car per 100 used cars). Since they have stricter require­ments, they were less exposed, and tended to act more con­ser­v­a­tively (usu­ally). Coin­ci­den­tally, since they’re kept in a more strict posi­tion and act more con­ser­v­a­tively, the town of Carville lends them money at a lower cost (The Fed­eral Reserve Sys­tem). These are the “real” com­mer­cial banks. That neigh­bor bought her for almost noth­ing. That neigh­bor is Bank of Amer­ica
* Gold­man Sachs and Mor­gan Stan­ley (Bob and Char­lie), went to the mayor and said they’d like to become truck deal­ers — pri­mar­ily in the hopes of get­ting their hands on that cheaper Carville town lend­ing that truck deal­ers get. That’s help­ing, but not a given solu­tion. “Old Jack”, the smartest man in Carville, saun­tered in from his ten mil­lion acre ranch and told Bob he’d give Bob some of the money he needed if Old Jack could have a whole bunch of things from Bob (includ­ing a 10% div­i­dend, which pays essen­tially $1.3 mil­lion a day). Of course, “Old Jack” is War­ren Buf­fett — what a great dealer :)
* Bear Stearns (Eddie) died early and was sold to JP Mor­gan months ago (not to be con­fused with Mor­gan Stan­ley)
But the saga con­tin­ues — as the Mayor and his peo­ple deter­mine how to deal with this — Wash­ing­ton Mutual, a “truck dealer” found itself so mas­sively extended in these CDO/MBSs, that they couldn’t meet the strict require­ments, and the Gov­ern­ment seized them and sold them ALSO to JP Mor­gan
What does the future hold? It’s gonna be more expen­sive to buy a used car for a while (get a loan), because everybody’s gotta make money and the prices will go up — and if the Gov­ern­ment does noth­ing, Carville will go bust and we’re all liv­ing in our farms alone. How’s your farm?
Your Farm:
Your farm is your per­sonal finan­cial sta­tus. You should be pri­mar­ily as debt free as you can be — your mort­gage, if you have one, should be very tra­di­tional and the low­est rate you can have — get out of your credit card debt, period.
Another thing about all of this is where it can get worse. See, there’s a LOT of Credit Card debt out there — and it could make things worse. If con­sumers are default­ing on their mort­gages, then they’re also going to default on their Credit Card debt. That’s going to cre­ate ANOTHER bur­den on the banks, and make the heavy lift­ing even heav­ier.
HOW YOU CAN HELP: DECREASE YOUR CREDIT CARD DEBT
How much credit card debt should you have? (None, but…) If the cash you have can’t pay the debt you carry, you’ve got too much. Stop invest­ing, stop buy­ing, pay off your cards now — it’s how we got here. You want respon­si­bil­ity? Yes, the ABC deal­ers are respon­si­ble, but the extreme credit card debt of con­sumers is the cause.
To do that is going to take an emo­tional shift. When you look at your flat screen TV, enjoy it — don’t then look at mine and say “Well, his is big­ger, I need a big­ger one too.” — stop look­ing at your neigh­bors and com­par­ing; just look at your­self and be happy, in other words — live off the land on your own farm, live within your means.
Bot­tom line? $10,000 cash is bet­ter than $20,000 and $10,000 in debt — for you, your farm, and our country.

  • Share/Bookmark
Filed under: Business No Comments
20Sep/080

The Transparency of the Invisible Hand

If you have read Adam Smith’s The Wealth of Nations or one of the hun­dreds of books that com­ment on that clas­sic, you’ll prob­a­bly know the term “the Invis­i­ble Hand”. This term ref­er­ences the out­come of a fully open free-market soci­ety that is dri­ven by self-interest.
But the annual rev­enue of every soci­ety is always pre­cisely equal to the exchange­able value of the whole annual pro­duce of its indus­try, or rather is pre­cisely the same thing with that exchange­able value. As every indi­vid­ual, there­fore, endeav­ors as much he can both to employ his cap­i­tal in the sup­port of domes­tic indus­try, and so to direct that indus­try that its pro­duce may be of the great­est value; every indi­vid­ual nec­es­sar­ily labors to ren­der the annual rev­enue of the soci­ety as great as he can. He gen­er­ally, indeed, nei­ther intends to pro­mote the pub­lic inter­est, nor knows how much he is pro­mot­ing it. By pre­fer­ring the sup­port of domes­tic to that of for­eign indus­try, he intends only his own secu­rity; and by direct­ing that indus­try in such a man­ner as its pro­duce may be of the great­est value, he intends only his own gain, and he is in this, as in many other cases, led by an invis­i­ble hand to pro­mote an end which was no part of his inten­tion. Nor is it always the worse for the soci­ety that it was not part of it. By pur­su­ing his own inter­est he fre­quently pro­motes that of the soci­ety more effec­tu­ally than when he really intends to pro­mote it. I have never known much good done by those who affected to trade for the pub­lic good. It is an affec­ta­tion, indeed, not very com­mon among mer­chants, and very few words need be employed in dis­suad­ing them from it.
Adam Smith — The Wealth of Nations
Smith’s pri­mary point is that when peo­ple work for their own inter­est in a fair, open mar­ket, they con­tribute to the over­all good of soci­ety in the process, not through their own coop­er­a­tion with oth­ers towards that over­all good — but by virtue of the eco­nomic process, the good comes about as if by virtue of an “Invis­i­ble Hand” guid­ing things.
In mod­ern “short speak”, if you look out for your­self, that’s gonna help every­one.
Well, there are a few huge prob­lems with that notion — not oper­a­tionally, but philo­soph­i­cally … prob­lems that don’t go into maudlin moral­ity or any other such notion — but sim­ply out­line that the Invis­i­ble Hand requires what I call trans­parency.
In the movie Wall Street, the char­ac­ter Gor­don Gecko says the famous line “Greed is good.“
As any novice investor or trader will tell you, greed and fear are the enemy when it comes to man­ag­ing your port­fo­lio — they cause you to make emo­tional deci­sions that under­mine your over­all return. So, in essence, (as we all know from our 2nd Grade Teach­ers), Greed actu­ally is not good.
But what hap­pens when a soci­ety, hav­ing been edu­cated to the very valid con­cepts of com­pet­i­tive advan­tage, and even Ricardo’s com­par­a­tive advan­tage — get it wrong and begin to equate Greed with self inter­est?
What hap­pens if, after read­ing two para­graph syn­opses of Smith’s ideas, an entire com­mu­nity, like the Invest­ment Com­mu­nity, gets it in their heads that Smith has cre­ated some sort of license to be a jerk, and cheat the next guy — since the process of look­ing out for your­self makes all nasty maneu­vers jus­ti­fied? We end up with the sort of deba­cle that’s been hap­pen­ing over the last 6 months.
Trans­parency, in my nomen­cla­ture, does not sim­ply apply to the pedan­tic demands by wounded civil­ians that the cor­po­ra­tions open their books, share the emails of their CEOs and allow us to see what they were think­ing. I present, instead, the idea that risk itself has an opac­ity — a qual­ity that requires us to ensure that what we know is every­thing nec­es­sary to be known. You can­not work for your own self inter­est if you do not under­stand what that self inter­est is. In the old say­ing, if you can’t see the sucker at the poker table, it’s you.
Con­sider the exam­ple of the dri­ver who does not know the bridge is out. He is dri­ving along, safely at the speed limit, when his wife calls and informs him that she is going into labor and he should race home so he can be with her as the baby is born. In his mind, it is sud­denly in his best inter­est to get home quickly, so he makes the choice to accel­er­ate — thus giv­ing him­self no oppor­tu­nity to respond to the miss­ing bridge in time and soon he’s swim­ming to the far side, hop­ing to call his wife from a soggy cell­phone.
Risk can­not be com­pletely removed, and as he accel­er­ates, the dri­ver increases the pos­si­bil­ity of that risk — but he is obliv­i­ous to that rela­tion­ship — he has dri­ven on this road a thou­sand times, he is a care­ful dri­ver — and while yes, dri­ving faster is a higher risk, it’s a cal­cu­lated risk he is will­ing to take.
So, the ques­tion becomes — how does one make the sit­u­a­tion more trans­par­ent for him, so that he can bet­ter rec­og­nize the choices he is mak­ing and truly make deci­sions in his own best inter­est? Such a ques­tion becomes the focus of reg­u­la­tors — the point of the exer­cise — and that opac­ity is their job to con­quer.
There are 5 places that the opac­ity against self inter­est can orig­i­nate. The first and most likely unavoid­able is ran­dom chance. We can­not rule out ran­dom chance — it will always be the Scepter of God — wielded at his Will and imper­vi­ous to our attempts to con­trol it.
The sec­ond most impor­tant one is our own igno­rance. If we do not under­stand what we are doing, we are that dri­ver blind­folded or refus­ing to read the signs by the side of the road. There will always be lunatic dri­vers out there — call them day traders and gam­bling spec­u­la­tors — but for the most part, if we can gen­er­ate a bet­ter and sim­pler method­ol­ogy for enabling our­selves to see clearly — but also to under­stand the details.
If our dri­ver sees a sign in Chi­nese, or is illit­er­ate — what will he do? He will act in per­ceived but inac­cu­rate self-interest, even­tu­ally hurt­ing us all in the process.
The third source of dan­ger is the igno­rance of oth­ers. That also would be reme­died by the same things that would save us. Oth­ers, pre­sum­ably work­ing in their own best inter­ests, may advise us to our own detri­ment. The man’s wife told him to move quickly — she was also igno­rant of the bridge.
The fourth source of con­fu­sion is the inten­tional act of oth­ers but not directly intended — there is the drunk dri­ver who drove over the sign in a stu­por — didn’t know what that bang was, and drove on. That dri­ver did some­thing to con­found us, but didn’t know it. That’s the largest group of peo­ple who inter­fere with the trans­parency of the invis­i­ble hand.
Finally — for the sake of this post — the fifth source of con­fu­sion is the inten­tion­ally evil per­son. Sadly, many peo­ple are equat­ing “get­ting over on the next guy” with self inter­est — which is fool­ish. If you make the world blind so you can be the one-eyed king — you will surely starve.
So — the ques­tion of my study becomes … how to con­trol the trans­parency — and how to know when you are truly see­ing a trans­par­ent sit­u­a­tion, and not just a mirage?

  • Share/Bookmark
Filed under: Business No Comments
3Jan/080

Day 2: Listless but continuing onward

So, I had a chance to speak with my land­lord today and found out that they will be doing lim­ited com­pe­ti­tion with me directly — so my choices are to get up off my duff and com­pete (thus, poten­tially over­whelm­ing my notions of Light­weight Busi­ness) or sit around and hope for the best.
Well, as with all things, the right way to pro­ceed is lazily — seek­ing only to do what one must and then do that with vigor. Cur­rently, I see no threats on the imme­di­ate hori­zon, but it’s clear that, once again, the new adage holds true, “when your eggs are in threat of being stomped, get more bas­kets.“
I’m going to look hard and long at the via­bil­ity of extend­ing out into other phys­i­cal areas beyond the cur­rent build­ing. That, of course, requires cash (check, sort of), and effort — here’s to watch­ing how well I main­tain the LWB (Light­weight Busi­ness doesn’t involve typ­ing THAT all the time) approach to expansion.

  • Share/Bookmark
Filed under: Business No Comments
2Jan/080

Another Year, Another Dollar

I find myself at the end of another day, the begin­ning of the busi­ness year, with the desire to do the biz equiv­a­lent of make res­o­lu­tions, start exer­cis­ing, and lose weight.
This time, I’m seri­ous — no really.
I was plug­ging through www.nytimes.com, enjoy­ing the sub­scrip­tion ben­e­fits I get in dig­i­tal form for the won­der­ful gift I received in wood-pulp sub­scrip­tion form; when I saw a sec­tion on small busi­ness and how blog­ging is a great mar­ket­ing tool for small busi­nesses.
Won­der­ful — but what do I have to say? Well, actu­ally, quite a bit. What do I have to say that peo­ple want to read? Not as much as the for­mer, but still — some.
See, I’ve run a busi­ness for 10 years that has lived and sur­vived in the white-hot cen­ter of the Inter­net sun. I pro­vide colo­ca­tion ser­vices to some very rec­og­niz­able brands, I book a few mil­lion a year in rev­enue, and we do it with a team of 3–4 peo­ple, plus con­trac­tors and out­sourc­ing. It’s what I’ve decided to call Light­weight Busi­ness — and I’ve got­ten the domains to prove it.
So, here’s the first step in set­ting up THAT blog, www.lightweightbiz.com … com­ing here to my old stale blog and see­ing if I can just put up a post once a day for a month. If I can do that, I’ll have devel­oped the right new habits to jus­tify a small-business blog. If not, well, you’re the only other per­son who has read this post — thanks for com­ing by.

  • Share/Bookmark
Filed under: Business No Comments
24Jun/06Off

One on One

So, I’m on my own in the com­pany again — pretty much. God’s got me where he wants me, and I’m glad for it.
I’m doing all the cod­ing in the com­pany now, using Eclipse and lov­ing it. If you code for real, and aren’t some HTML/Javascript script kid­die (ok, there are some of you out there who are really “mas­ters” of JS and so forth — my sin­cere apolo­gies to you), then you need to get Eclipse or some other IDE into your life.
If you don’t know what an IDE is, it’s an Inte­grated Devel­op­ment Envi­ron­ment — which means that it does a LOT of the think­ing for you. It may seem mun­dane, but hav­ing a code edi­tor that can lookup the orig­i­nal loca­tion of that func­tion you’re call­ing, color code your syn­tax and check your valid­ity is key to suc­cess.
Tomor­row, two teens in our YG are going to be bap­tized! I think that rocks.
Not a lot else to report, no opin­ions or atti­tudes. Just sit­ting around think­ing is all. Still try­ing to get blog­ging into my daily rou­tine.
You’d think that the owner of a small busi­ness in one of the most con­cen­trated build­ings for Inter­net in the world would have some­thing inter­est­ing to say — and I do — but the ques­tion really is — do I want to put it onto the Inter­net for all of you to read forever?

  • Share/Bookmark
Filed under: Business Comments Off