CPUnk I write right. Right? Aye.

19Jun/100

More clothing, and a mixed blessings bank experience

Yes­ter­day, we all went shop­ping again — this time Kathy and Angie got their own per­sonal shop­pers, and Nate and I headed off to the men’s sec­tion for me (Nate couldn’t care less about clothes for him­self for the most part).

So, we had a great time shop­ping in our sep­a­rate camps — Kathy and Angie bought a lot of great stuff, as did I (I bought a lot MORE great stuff than they did — but that’s ok, beats a watch :) ). So, towards the end of the day, Olga and I are close friends, we’re chat­ting away the whole day in French, talk­ing about what we like and don’t like — meet­ing all the dif­fer­ent peo­ple in the store (she’s a real celebrity in the store, she’s been there for 30 years, every­body loves her, all the peo­ple work­ing there were grab­bing at her for atten­tion at dif­fer­ent times). It was really fun to walk around with her — because we sort of had “run of the place.” All the “you may stand here and wait for your turn to talk about this pair of pants” stuff that goes on nor­mally in a depart­ment store — that was gone … we’d walk up to a spe­cific depart­ment or brand area and the peo­ple would turn, see her, see me, SMILE broadly and imme­di­ately want to help. Mul­ti­ply that by the fact that every­one was French, and you can see how it was fun to have this “back door into the sys­tem” kind of access.

We spent a major­ity of our time at Zadig & Voltaire which is a new favorite brand for me … the clothes are pretty cool. That was our first stop, so Nate was still into it — while he played his DS, he’d look up every once in a while and say “no, Dad, I don’t like that col­lar — it’s too dull”, then go back to his DS. But that wore off soon, and he was ready to do some­thing else.

Well, Olga threw her weight around and we went to the cham­pagne bar run by Moet. Behind them, there was a pri­vate porch salon that was cur­rently closed, but had an enclosed fancy schmancy trans­par­ent tent with sofas and pil­lows inside. She strolled up and asked/told them that Nate was going to use that tent for the day, so he got to hang out in lux­u­ri­ous secu­rity while we rolled around the store buy­ing things.

Towards lunchtime, Olga ran off and got me a foie gras sand­wich — which was pretty awe­some. She came back with the sand­wich and said she had also given one to Nate (uh oh).

“Oh, that’s won­der­ful,”, said I, “let’s go visit him for a lit­tle while?”

“D’accord.”, she said. (happy agreement).

So, we roll up on the trans­par­ent tent, and there’s my brave boy, gamely gnaw­ing politely on this thing that’s been handed to him. She had enthu­si­as­ti­cally handed him a foie gras sand­wich, he has COMPLETELY politely taken it, said thank you, and bit­ten into the thing with­out com­plaint. By the time we’d arrived, she was enthu­si­as­ti­cally ask­ing him if he was enjoy­ing the sand­wich and he was say­ing yes … then she said she was going to head off for a few min­utes as well (per­haps to eat) and would be back in 15 min­utes. “D’accord.”, said I.

As soon as she was out of the tent…

“Daaad?…”, says Nate.
“Yeah, son.”, say I, sup­press­ing a grin.
“I really don’t like this sand­wich AT ALL.” :D
“Oh, I fig­ured that — I’m really proud of you, buddy, for how you han­dled your­self — really, really proud.”

So I threw myself on the grenade for him and ate his sand­wich too. So now, my finicky boy has not only eaten goat face in Africa, he’s eaten duck liver (this was foie gras du canard, I’m pretty sure) in France. I’m a proud papa :)

Bank­ing Gone Bad
Ok, fast for­ward to the end of the day — Olga and I are chat­ting away — we don’t got to Eng­lish much, but I’m start­ing to get a lit­tle tired. I called Kathy (using Olga’s spe­cial in-store mobile phone to call the other per­sonal shop­per, because we’re so cool), and Kathy says she’s wrap­ping up. Olga and I are look­ing for a new wal­let (which we didn’t get, even though the folks at Gucci, Ver­sace and Prada were think­ing we should :P ), when Kathy calls to start talk­ing about how to coor­di­nate her return to my build­ing. Acti­vate moment of exhaustion.

So, I’m stand­ing there, with the phone to my ear, in the Ver­sace depart­ment, Kathy’s talk­ing into my ear in Eng­lish about how she’ll get all her stuff over to our build­ing — and Olga is talk­ing in my other ear in French about how she can han­dle the whole thing for us — and Kathy is talk­ing about how we might want to leave it all here while we go to Notre Dame, and would that be pos­si­ble — and Olga is say­ing that she will com­bien tout l’ensemble ici and Kathy is say­ing that if we could, it would be nice to pick it up tomor­row and Olga is say­ing nous sommes ferme demain and Kathy’s say­ing we really don’t want to take all this stuff with us to Notre Dame and I’m start­ing to spin and *poof*

… hello, this is your brain’s inter­nal French trans­la­tion depart­ment — we have shut down for the evening, you can now only say “chat” and “chien” (cat and dog) — have a good day.

Ok. Un moment. Je ne pense pas qu’il est pos­si­ble for me to make sense out of this sit­u­a­tion quand je parle avec both of you at once.

So — I strug­gle to the sur­face for air — and ask Olga if we can leave every­thing until Mon­day. I’m strug­gling to under­stand her but she says basi­cally that she can gar­ble blark mark Mon­day floop mongo Hotel. I take that to mean that she’ll have the entire group of stuff dropped off on Mon­day at the hotel. Superb!

The sit­u­a­tion is resolved — but please note, I’ve gone from flu­ent French to back of the class­room from that tense experience.

Then Kathy calls back a few min­utes later — “Honey, my card was declined.”

I’m not going to go into too much detail — but these are cards that don’t get declined.

Under nor­mal cir­cum­stances, when a snafu like this hap­pens — I’d just call my banker/broker at Schwab, Matt Pick­ett — and he’d flip a switch and all would be well. But Matt’s self­ishly decided to leave because his wife is hav­ing a baby. The nerve — doesn’t he know I’m buy­ing CLOTHES in PARIS?!!! :D

Well, as a backup, we’d usu­ally call his asso­ciate, Bran­don Siler, who han­dles our “fast and dirty” spe­cial needs (wire trans­fers, etc.). Bran­don is also COMPLETELY self-centered and has left on his hon­ey­moon. I mean, who do these peo­ple think they ARE? I’m buy­ing pants AND shirts. I’ve eaten foie gras!

Well, it’s time to break glass in case of emer­gency. I took the iPhone out of air­plane mode. It shud­dered with antic­i­pa­tion as some­where an AT&T billing com­puter turned its sleepy eye our way, licked its lips and started my inter­na­tional meter.

I called Schwab’s inter­na­tional phone sup­port line. You’d think that the inter­na­tional sup­port line would come in through some voice­mail tree that is faster, since well — it’s inter­na­tional, right? Nope. “Howdy, wel­come to Schwab — press one if you’d like to take a really long time — oth­er­wise please wait just a nor­mal long time for the next avail­able associate.”

While wait­ing, I lis­tened to the play­ful sound of my pock­ets emp­ty­ing into AT&T’s bank accounts.

“Hi, this is Schwab, how can I help you?”
“I’m call­ing from Paris, this is $1/min, my card has been declined.”
“Oh! Let me ver­ify you and then I’ll trans­fer you to the appro­pri­ate depart­ment!” … arg.
…verify…verify…
back to the hold music of my money dis­ap­pear­ing
“Hi, this is Schwab bank sup­port, I under­stand you are call­ing from Paris — do you have a num­ber we can call back?”

Olga, Olga! Chat! Chien! Com­ment t’alez vous?!!! … oh damn … how do you say “I need the phone num­ber for your spe­cial phone so I can get an inter­na­tional inbound call returned from my bank to deblock my wife’s credit card?”

“Je desit un numer pour tele­phone pour ma banque me rap­peller?” (I need a num­ber for phone for my bank me to callback).

insert grap­pling with phone num­bers — coun­try codes (the iPhone bill is still run­ning, mind you) — and then hang up.

Now we wait.

Poor, poor Shelly the Schwab oper­a­tor. It took her about 10 min­utes — but she fought her way back through the snooty depart­ment store switch­board using her high­school French and found us again. I con­grat­u­lated her profusely.

She told me she’d make a note of the costs for the call and see to it that we were reim­bursed for our iPhone charges, and worked to remove the block on Kathy’s card. She said that the block was because Kathy’s card doesn’t usu­ally have this sort of behav­ior — my card would work fine — but hers needed to be cleared (after all, I had no prob­lems yesterday).

Shelly advised wait­ing 15 min­utes, then Kathy could try it again. All very nice — so we do that. Mean­while, Notre Dame is slip­ping through our fin­gers (which ended up work­ing out for the best).

Mean­while — since Olga is just stand­ing around — all the young man­agers from the var­i­ous depart­ments are reach­ing out to her and beg­ging her to help them with things — what, I don’t know … but she’s really peeved by it, keeps telling them she’s with a client … and that’s adding to the tension.

Kathy tries her card again — no love. AAAAaaaarrrghhh…

Ok — we’ll head over there and use my card.

We grab Nate, head out of the build­ing, cross the street to the other build­ing, find Kathy, Angie and Olivia (their shop­per) and every­one is stand­ing in line for a major pur­chase at the teller. It’s a huge line because the guy in front of us (who also has a “lesser” shop­per, it would seem) is try­ing to pay on mul­ti­ple cards. Stand around, stand around.

I sug­gest that Kathy take the kids some­where to eat — which she does. So now I have the room to get my Mal­colm on. I ask if there’s any way we can get around this ridicu­lous line — so one of Kathy’s shop­pers (Olivia had an assis­tant, it would seem) asks if we can cut in for 2 min­utes to run my card. Every­one agrees. We shoul­der our way in — and presto! Card declined.

Rokey dokey smokey — I’ll just be tak­ing off my charm hat now. Here, Olga, hold my smile — I’m call­ing Schwab.

The gang of per­sonal shop­pers scurry me off to the ladies pri­vate shop­per salon — they can tell I’m less than enthused — and I think from my body lan­guage, it’s pretty clear that some poor banker is about to die, and that this isn’t about lim­its or anything.

They sit me down in a chic-chic room for ladies, throw some orange juice at me and run away. Well, most do — Olga blithely sits with me, fully aware that beneath this ter­ri­fy­ing exte­rior beats the heart of a very nice person.

Acti­vate iPhone…

tra la la — Schwab voice­mail prompts –

“Hello, wel­come to –“
“Call­ing from Paris, every­one must die, fix now.”
“Ter­ri­bly sorry, work­ing quickly, please ver­ify.”
“Ver­ify.”
“Trans­fer­ring now.”
“Amber here, ter­ri­fied, wel­come to bank, please let me live.”
“Sorry you are unhappy, fix prob­lem.”
“Fix­ing prob­lem now sir, please do not eat me. Will involve man­ager, please may I call back?”
“Cell­phone num­ber.”
“Ten minutes.”

Chat with Olga — who seems to sug­gest some­thing like “oh, it’s just a secu­rity thing (which it was), let us stay happy.” So we did.

iPhone rings
“Amber here — all is well — may I stay on the line while we con­firm?”
“Thanks, Amber, let’s see how that works out, you’re a really nice per­son.” — oh look, my human­ity — I found it again.

So we all head back out to the teller, I’m chat­ting with Amber, who’s telling me that she was really afraid of hav­ing to call in through the store, because her French is ter­ri­ble — ergo the iPhone call­back. We laugh, we cry, we’re hav­ing a great time.

The French peo­ple all start talk­ing really fast to each other. Olivia is reach­ing around for receipts, tick­ets, all sorts of stuff.
I turn to Olga, who explains that the “work­ing receipt” for all of Kathy’s pur­chases has expired, because they’re only valid for an hour after they are sub­mit­ted and fail. Zut Alors!

So, the hero(ine) of the day is the lady behind the glass at the reg­is­ter. She was fir­ing away at the key­pad, enter­ing the ENTIRE day’s orders by hand at a speed that made me think of Heather on the cal­cu­la­tor (shout out to Heather and her lick­ety split fin­gers!) … the woman types and types — they scan and check and con­firm that every­thing is right. They ALSO apply 10% dis­count on a major­ity of stuff because Kathy had some sort of super duper dis­count card (because she rocks). They ALSO set up the parts we need for VAT (I think?) — so we’ll get another 12% back from taxes. Woot, this is like Christmas!

Mean­while, Amber and I are still con­nected and run­ning up my iPhone bill.

The time had come. I hand over the card.

In a tech­no­log­i­cally inter­est­ing moment — Amber tells me that the pur­chase has been approved … and THEN the lit­tle ticker tape on the desk starts spit­ting out it’s con­fir­ma­tion. Cheers and clap­ping all around. Laugh­ter and relief. Ain’t life grand?

I thank Amber, get her name and con­tact info so I can tell other peo­ple how great she is, and hang up.

“Mon Dieu!”, I exclaim … Olga vir­tu­ally slaps me on the back and com­pli­ments me on my proper use of French. Seems it’s all come back to me now.

After­math
So, we ended up skip­ping Notre Dame, got our clothes back to the hotel our­selves — poor Olga stayed an hour later than her check­out time — she’s a won­der­ful, won­der­ful per­son. Ends up she’s a Chris­t­ian too (we find each other), we chat­ted about that a bit — then wished her well, and she us as well.

Nate and I went off to the local toy store and bought a Lego kit for him as a cel­e­bra­tion of his impec­ca­ble behav­ior the entire day (Olga kept com­pli­ment­ing him on how gen­tile he is (polite)). So, Legos in hand, he was all set for the night in the hotel. Angie, mean­while, had had a great time buy­ing clothes (as any young girl should in Paris, imho), but was tired — so she was all set for the night. So Kathy and I decided to dress up in fancy clothes and go to din­ner alone (the kids were full from their foray in the store while I fought with Schwab).

We headed off to one of the places we’d vis­ited last night. This was a pretty nice place, quite busy — called Les Grands Capucins … which means “The Big Capuchins” (look it up). Big place, lots of activ­ity — a wee bit too much atti­tude… but we were bound to give it another try.

The food ended up being ridicu­lous… there’s an entire story there about me tak­ing on a pompous French waiter and win­ning in his own court — but this post is too long … so suf­fice to say … we had din­ner in spite of the poor service.

We ordered some food, enjoyed each other’s com­pany — and lo and behold… my card was declined.

I decided that the com­pany needed me happy — so I used the com­pany card. I’ll reim­burse the com­pany for din­ner when I get home (shout out to Heather (dou­ble shout out, Heather, woot!)).

I got back to the hotel — called Schwab (again) — talked with Tony — insert dia­log here — he con­nected us directly to Visa Fraud pre­ven­tion … they in turn had a full stop on our account because of the weird pur­chase pat­tern. All is fixed — for now.

Kinda can’t wait to find out what hap­pens next with my card that can’t be beat.

Sacre Bleu!

  • Share/Bookmark
18Jun/100

A day of being American in Paris: running, buying clothes, and eating nasty food

So, yes­ter­day was a pretty awe­some day. I started out the day with a run in Paris … which sure beats the tread­mill in my bed­room (and for those more fit­ness ori­ented friends, yes I did stretch a lot before­hand, made all the dif­fer­ence in the world). My super Nike+ shoes with the magic tech­nol­ogy that talks to my iPhone didn’t work in Air­plane mode — which makes sense. But when I first got out of the hotel — I started up the magic Nike+ app on my phone and was heart­bro­ken to see that the shoe wasn’t respond­ing (yes, I couldn’t all my shoe effec­tively). I didn’t fig­ure out it was the air­plane mode and though maybe the shoe had got­ten busted in travel.

So, given that — I opted to just run any­way (arg — sim­ply run­ning, with­out magic tech­nol­ogy to tell me every­thing as I run? How prim­i­tive) … and headed out into the streets of Paris. It was cool being “that early morn­ing run­ning Amer­i­can guy” while all the pretty Parisians were stand­ing around in their cool clothes smok­ing cig­a­rettes and watch­ing me with casual con­tempt (or per­haps inter­est on a few corners).

I had my tunes going, lis­ten­ing to some old 80/90s pro­gres­sive stuff — so it was sud­denly a very Euro expe­ri­ence (I mean, c’mon, Depeche Mode while run­ning in Paris, your head just explodes with the atti­tude that engenders).

Since the streets of Paris was laid out by a bunch of cows, drunks and peo­ple wear­ing lead-based make-up, the streets criss-cross in the most psy­chotic ways pos­si­ble — so it’s more than easy to get com­pletely lost, and then pull out your handy dandy map and still be com­pletely lost. After try­ing that a few times, I decided to just run and “use the force” to find some­thing I could recognize.

Using that logic, I decided my best bet was to turn towards large gath­er­ings of trees and big avenues. That got me more lost — but even­tu­ally, after about an hour of run­ning and stop­ping and run­ning (mostly run­ning, with a lit­tle walk­ing), I found the river. Thank­fully, I was near a weird spot where the river splits, so I could find it on the map — iron­i­cally, I had been under the impres­sion that I was to the West of the hotel, but I’d got­ten com­pletely turned around and was on the East­ern side.

So, once I had my bear­ings, I fig­ured out that I was about 2 miles from the hotel, which was cool. I was all warmed up, my legs were feel­ing pretty good, and I was stand­ing next to the Seine with the Eif­fel tower off in the dis­tance as a ref­er­ence point, and Notre Dame across the river nearby. That was pretty cool.

Dur­ing my wan­der­ings, I tried my GPS app on the iPhone, which involves tak­ing the phone out of air­plane mode. Of course, in that process, I dis­cov­ered that my magic shoes could talk again — so I acti­vated that and had a fun run back to the hotel. I ran along the Seine, down to the Lou­vre, through their gar­dens, turned at the Lou­vre arch (not to be con­fused with L’Arc de Tri­om­phe”) — ran through that for good mea­sure, then cut back into the 2eme Quar­ter and headed for the Opera house. Our hotel is near the Opera house, so I found my way home, felt great and loved that it was all that and a bag of chips too.

Dur­ing the run, I took a few pho­tos, like this:

wpid-IMG_0467-2010-06-19-04-35.jpg wpid-IMG_0474-2010-06-19-04-35.jpg wpid-IMG_0476-2010-06-19-04-35.jpg
wpid-IMG_0479-2010-06-19-04-35.jpg wpid-IMG_0478-2010-06-19-04-35.jpg wpid-IMG_0482-2010-06-19-04-35.jpg

because life is a com­pe­ti­tion, right? :D

So — after a got back to the hotel, I set up the TRX sys­tem and worked out some more — which was fun, dif­fi­cult, and more fun.

Then we decided to split the day up into boys and girls — so Angie and Kathy went shop­ping for a purse for Angie, and Nate and I went to L’Ecole Mil­i­taire (the mil­i­tary school), which has a pretty cool because they have a museum filled with guns and junk.

Nate espe­cially enjoyed him­self with all the can­nons and stuff:

wpid-IMG_0016-2010-06-19-04-35.jpg

…as well as vis­it­ing the creepy tomb of Napoleon (which is huge, btw — that guy REALLY had a com­plex, even in death):

wpid-IMG_0019-2010-06-19-04-35.jpg

(the scale is odd in this pic­ture, but that brown box, that’s actu­ally about 20 feet long and 25 feet high — we’re over an atrium, see the tiny peo­ple at about 12 o’clock one flight down?) Napoleon hated being small.

Sooo… after that, we headed back to the mar­ket, bought a cool purse for Angie — and I had a chance to buy some cheese and pate in French… loads of fun.

Buy­ing Clothes
After a break — Kathy decided we should go buy some clothes — so we went to Grand Lafayette — which is a fancy depart­ment store in the heart of Paris. When we got there, I asked where the men’s sec­tion was and after a lit­tle point­ing — it was explained that it was in the other build­ing across the street, the men’s building.

So we headed over to the store ded­i­cated only for men and began look­ing at Prada, D&G, Burberry, and stuff like that and my head started to explode. So we asked for a per­sonal shop­per, and they sent over Olga, a very, very nice lady who’s been doing this for 30 years. She walked me around, spent my money — chat­ted with me in French and a lit­tle Eng­lish — and we bought some clothes. I’m just gonna leave it there — it’s kind of appalling, actually.

Suf­fice to say, my foray into fancy clothes has begun — we’re lov­ing that I have a physique to jus­tify these clothes — and I now am the embar­rassed owner of a pair of D&G jeans (shout out to Hillary and Heather). We’re going back tomor­row for some more shirts, pos­si­bly some shoes, and a jacket. One thing that makes it a lit­tle bit safer is that they don’t have a lot of the expen­sive stuff in my size — so we avoid a feed­ing frenzy. All the shirts are slim fit — which rocks.

Nasty Food
While I was going through the cloth­ing expe­di­tion with Olga, Kathy took the kids back to the hotel, because they were tired. Once she returned, we got to leave the depart­ment store after hours (you see, we had a per­sonal shop­per), and headed out car­ry­ing my D&G bag, but still wear­ing my nasty shirt (the store will be clean­ing and press­ing the shirts we’ve pur­chased thus far so I can pick them up tomor­row). You’d think the bag would get us a moment’s peace with the wait­ers at the Cafes, but nope — no love there.

They were rude, ignored us, all the stan­dard stuff. We tried a sushi joint for a sec­ond — but that was a non-starter — Paris has not com­pletely embraced the fine sushi expe­ri­ence — so it was about as appe­tiz­ing as super­mar­ket take-out … so we left.

Our third try was a nicer place that promised to have lob­ster and crab and all sorts of other cool stuff — but on fur­ther inspec­tion — we found that thye were out of the good stuff and would we like this other thing instead? Oh, by the way, at this point my dogs were tired — I’d been walk­ing around in my Chucks all day (and yes, that prob­a­bly added to the atti­tude — my bright green Chuck Tay­lor shoes in Paris) … so when the ser­vice was slow, and the options were lim­ited … we left there too.

Finally — we gave up, and in a moment of exhausted frus­tra­tion — we went to McDonald’s. Yes, that’s right. We bought fine Prada cloth­ing and fin­ished off the day eath­ing Mickey D’s. Ahhh… the life of a Cosmopolitan.

Well — we’re back in the hotel — have rested for a while — I woke up at 3am — am post­ing this stuff … and that’s about it for now.

More later.

  • Share/Bookmark
17Jun/100

I am a giant

In Europe, every­thing is smaller — it’s just the nature of the crea­ture because it’s so cramped. The cars are smaller, the hotel rooms are smaller (even Kathy com­mented on how small the bath­room is — it’s the size of a closet) … we have a “quad” in our hotel (which, for the record is very nice), but it’s made up of two rooms joined through the “adjoin­ing doors” — –and I kid you not, the com­bined space is smaller than our liv­ing room.

But the best part is that I tower (tower, I tell you) over just about every­body in France. I am a giant — I can reach out and crush small build­ings, I eat vil­lages, I am a giant Amer­i­can giant man.

I went into a store to see if they had clothes in my size, just for fun — and the guy asked me if I was XXL or XXXL. I was so huge he’d lost ref­er­ence sizes in his mind.

I can’t tell — but the food por­tions may be get­ting big­ger around here — that’s a lit­tle scary, because Euro­peans can’t afford to be fat — there’s no room. But maybe it’s just that, since every­thing is so tiny — we’re feel­ing more full on smaller por­tions, because well — they look big­ger (if a plate of peas fills the room, it looks big, no?

Well — in any event … I’m enjoy­ing tow­er­ing over this entire con­ti­nent (when we walked through the Ams­ter­dam air­port, I hap­pily reported to the kids (in a large open space filled with thou­sands of peo­ple) “I am the tallest per­son in this air­port” … they looked around and smiled.

So far, I haven’t smacked my head on any­thing — even though the doors ARE shorter (and likely often older than our country).

I will not climb over that moun­tain range over there and say too­dledo for now!

  • Share/Bookmark
17Jun/100

Eiffel Tower visit

We went to the Eif­fel tower — it was tall.

When we got there, they said that the top floor was closed. We decided to go to the sec­ond floor — but when we got there — there was an Easter Egg (it’s a video game ref­er­ence) and we found a place to buy tick­ets to go to the top! So … ummm… we bought the tick­ets from the machine, imme­di­ately got on the ele­va­tors (which were run­ning and manned with oper­a­tors?) … and went up to the top, which was closed.

There were all sorts of other peo­ple going there too, mind you … but it was weird — it was like some­one had the very French idea to put up a sign that said “go away” — and then when you ignored that sign, you got every­thing on the menu.

Well — suf­fice to say, we got good pic­tures, had a good time — and then went home. Strangely, the World Cup is so pop­u­lar that they lit­er­ally had a giant TV set up in front of the Eif­fel Tower so peo­ple could watch the games (we went by while Argentina was beat­ing South Korea). It’s REALLY big here, the World Cup — you’d almost think we were in Europe or something.

On a related note — I’ve been watch­ing the World Cup stuff a lit­tle more — and well … it looks like Greece beat Nige­ria (the TV is in French) … that’s all I know about that. I think (aside from the US, of course) that the Ger­mans are “the show” currently.

So … we’re back to the hotel, we’re try­ing to stay awake again until 8-9pm … and after that … we do some­thing else … no idea what.

Just wanted to tell you that we got to the tower — mis­sion com­plete on that front.

  • Share/Bookmark
16Jun/100

Day 1 — Paris

It’s 9am, and we’re all awake and feel­ing rel­a­tively ok — so it looks like the jet­lag magic worked so far. We’ll still be a lit­tle punchy for the next day or two, but over­all, it’s the fastest way to get right with the world post-jetlag.

Today we’re headed off to see La Tour Eif­fel (that’s French for the Eif­fel Tour). We went there a long time ago when the kids were smaller — it’ll be fun to go again.

For break­fast, we went down into the dun­geon that is below this hotel and had … break­fast. It wasn’t any­thing espe­cially excit­ing … just crois­sants, eggs, sausage and stuff like that. Mostly stuff they bought at the super­mar­ket I think. Luck­ily, it as 12 Euros a per­son — which is ridicu­lous — so next time we’re going to go to the nearby cafe and have fun that way.

We’ve befriended a waiter at the nearby cafe — he speaks very good Eng­lish and calls us “Seat­tle” … we asked him where he learned to speak Eng­lish and he said he has a girl­friend from the US — so I’ve dubbed him “Lover­boy” … we’ll see how that flies.

My French is lim­ber­ing up, and I don’t seem to annoy any­body — so that’s a good thing. So far, I’ve pro­nounced Aurelie’s (our pri­mary Hotel desk atten­dant) cor­rectly — and I suc­cess­fully asked the break­fast per­son if it is ok for us to take a cup of cof­fee with us up to our room (Peut-etre on tiens d’une tass de caffe au la cham­bre, s’il vous plait?) … to which the break­fast lady emphat­i­cally responded in French, “Cer­tainly, your shoes are good for the day in a pinap­ple!” (but my trans­la­tion might be a lit­tle off). In any event, she handed us the cof­fee on a spe­cial plate and seemed quite happy to help!

Phrases we say a lot are:

S’il vous plait (Please)
Merci Beau­coup (Thank you)
Bon­jour, ca va? (Hello, how’s it going?)
D’accord (I under­stand)
Evide­ment votre charges sont tres chere et aussi tres fou!

More later :)

  • Share/Bookmark
16Jun/100

Arrived in Paris

We’re here — we’re exhausted — we HAVE FREE WIFI!!!! WOOT. That means that for the first week, I’ll have lots of GOOD Inter­net here in the hotel, where I’m sit­ting on the bed right now — so I might actu­ally post stuff.

Here’s a pic­ture of me out of my mind on the hotel bed. I’m exhausted — the kids are burnt, Kathy’s tired — we have about 6 hours on our jet­lag math — then we can sleep and reset our clocks.

wpid-Hotel_Gramont-2010-06-16-03-29.jpg

  • Share/Bookmark
15Jun/100

Traveling to Amsterdam

Ok — the good news is that my jour­nal soft­ware lets me write stuf and then post it to the blog later — so once again — there’s the pos­si­bil­ity, how­ever slim, that I’ll blog more reg­u­larly :)

Our start was pretty non-eventful, got packed last night, the kids are in good shape, Hillary (shout out!) met me at the ter­mi­nal to sign a few last minute doc­u­ments — and we headed to the airport.

The peo­ple at Delta had given Kathy some mediocre advice and we ended up with me slated to get into a coach seat. Now, I know — so what, right? Well, our big con­cern is always that I’ll throw out my back sit­ting in a chair like that for so long.

We asked about upgrades, but it would seem that this is a pretty pop­u­lar flight, so to upgrade was only $7000 for the first leg of the flight. Kathy was all set to do it, but I said no :D

Then, by some gen­eros­ity, the lady behind the counter called some­one and started whis­per­ing into the phone. She said that when we got to the gate, we should ask for “Kay” and that there was the pos­si­bil­ity we could get an upgrade for less.

We got to the gate, and they gave us “spe­cial ser­vice upgrade” for only a few hun­dred bucks — very worth the price. Kathy and the kids are in coach, and I’m sit­ting up here like some sort of pasha because I’m tall and have a weak back. Something’s not right about that — but I get it too … so I’m let­ting it happen.

To assuage my guilt, at least the seats are seats … they’re not fully enclosed super pods like other inter­na­tional flights — the seats go all the way back, which is nice — but oth­er­wise, they’re just spacier and have more leg room.

They call it Busi­ness Class — so I’m guess­ing that this is just a really pop­u­lar busi­ness flight — there’s not “first class” … but also, there’s plenty of com­fort here and stuff.

Im very grate­ful for the adjust­ment — I think I’d be happy to fly back on coach on the return … some­thing about mate­ri­al­ism, etc. Hope­fully, with all my exer­cis­ing, I’ll be able to last through it — have a strong back and all that — wouldn’t that be cool?

Other small notes — I started watch­ing the movie The Road with Vigo Mortensen or what­ever his name is. It’s yucky and I hated it. It’s Mad Max with­out the warmth. Yawn … let’s write a story about bad stuff and shock you with the bad­ness … how original.

I also watched Pre­cious .… and of course, that cheered me up no end … as I sit here in my upgraded seat, typ­ing on my lap­top with a solid state hard-drive because I’m hop­ing that all my friends and fam­ily will be ok with me post­ing to my blog.

Well … I’m sup­posed to be on vaca­tion … so I’m going to try to enjoy myself all the same.

On the “jet lag” cal­cu­la­tor, we’re slated to sleep in the next hour … get about four hours, then have a two hour lay­over in Ams­ter­dam, sleep on the flight to Paris, and then try to stay awake for 8 hours. Hope­fully that will work. More on that if we get wifi.

See? I’m blog­ging — I’m on the plane and I’m blogging.

Oh — one more thing … I’ve spo­ken with the folks at AT&T and had my “visual voice­mail” turned off. Accord­ing to them (and I have oper­a­tor IDs to back me up), with voice­mail turned off, I can receive calls, not answer them and then not pay the $1 per call for receiv­ing the call (obvi­ously, If I answer, I have to pay).

So … the the­ory is that I’ll be able to keep my phone online and receive texts (received are free — sent are $0.50 per, so expect email responses more than any­thing (wifi permitting)).

So, the exper­i­ment is that I’ll be able to receive “please con­tact me” mes­sages … and then go to wifi and IM, or maybe even some sort of crazy phone game through our phones — who knows.

In short — feel “free” to text me for now … but don’t get crazy with it either … but please do let every­one know while I’ve been told that I can receive calls and “selec­tively answer” for free … I’m not trust­ing it yet — and would pre­fer that every­one keep it light on phonecalls (my rate is $1.00 per minute).

Ok? Ok. Onward. Almost time to sleep — we just made land­fall over Nuuk (Godthab) … I think the “(Godthab)” is writ­ten for clar­i­fi­ca­tion, in case you didn’t under­stand what Nuuk means… after all … we’ve all heard of tra­di­tional Godthab, right? Nuuk … how silly.

  • Share/Bookmark
9Jun/100

Long blog entry and a fire drill

So — this is not a long blog entry. I’m work­ing on an inter­est­ing arti­cle relat­ing to the Rocky Hor­ror Pic­ture Show, and its reflec­tion on sex­ual deviance in soci­ety and how soci­ety inter­acts with any sta­tis­ti­cal deviance. Since it’s a long arti­cle — I’m tak­ing a while to write it — but since I com­mit­ted to writ­ing reg­u­larly — I’m just blog­ging to say “watch this space.”

The ele­ments of the arti­cle are kind of inter­est­ing — it’s not “yet another dia­tribe” about a par­tic­u­lar point of view — in fact, I think, if I do say so myself, that I deftly jump from view­point to view­point with the skill and artistry of a Russ­ian acro­bat in Cirque du Soleil.

Mean­while — a brief note that we had a small car­bon monix­ide adven­ture last night — the detec­tor went off, and Kathy Nate and I were in the house. It was excit­ing, but more so because we had a fire drill pro­grammed into our fam­ily — so we knew what to do. We all just evac­u­ated the house, called 911, the fire­fight­ers came, and Nate got his pic­ture taken with them after they con­firmed the house was ok.

It unded up that a deflec­tor plate over one of the burn­ers in the house was tilted, and too much popane was get­ting out and burn­ing inef­fi­ciently — so we had CO.

Well, here’s to good train­ing, here’s to an excit­ing day — and here’s to not hav­ing to do THAT again!

  • Share/Bookmark
Filed under: General No Comments
9Jun/100

Rocky Horror and the Cultural Wars

So, this may not please every­body who reads it — how sad is it that in a time of sup­posed dis­course and open com­mu­ni­ca­tion, the enjoin­der that not every­one will like this state­ment will actu­ally turn off cer­tain minds — drive them to stop read­ing and/or ignore the opin­ions and out­look from another point of view? Well, that’s The Rocky Hor­ror Pic­ture Show first entered the scene; as a sec­ondary point of view, out­ra­geous in its con­tent and camp, gen­er­at­ing an imme­di­ate shut­down of lis­ten­ing on the part of an entire seg­ment of soci­ety, the Reli­gious Right and con­ser­v­a­tive America.

Well, as with all things human, what goes around comes around. Now, the point of view I’m pre­sent­ing will seem to be com­ing from the “right”, and will surely shut down many peo­ple who oth­er­wise would con­sider them­selves open-minded. That, iron­i­cally, seems to be my lot in life as a social out­lier — I tend to say things that peo­ple don’t want to hear, and then watch as they shut down in order to pro­tect their own sense of open-mindedness. When I say that I’m a social out­lier, I’m a socially open-minded Con­ser­v­a­tive Chris­t­ian who pur­sues an aggres­sively Ortho­dox posi­tion on God and Christ — so that’s a bit unique (though less so every day, as proven by churches like Mars Hill, for example).

So what point of view will I stand upon that will shut down the silent dia­log between me and you, dear reader? It is this: soci­ety has a need to gen­er­ate a socially accept­able place for out­lier per­son­al­i­ties rather than shun them … BUT in so doing, that place should not be pre­sented as an attempt to allow those sta­tis­ti­cal deviants to become mem­bers of “the sta­tis­ti­cal norm”, and thereby mod­ify the norm from what it cur­rently is. I say this because the resul­tant math­e­mat­i­cal skew will change the norm, and as such, change the entire body of human­ity. There, I think I’ve suc­cess­fully excluded everyone.

So what do I mean? Let’s take a look at Dr. Franken­furter from Rocky Hor­ror. Here is a crea­ture who is will­ing, and desirous, to par­take in any form of sex­ual deviancy at all — to inter­act phys­i­cally with man, woman, child, ani­mal or alien — solely for the pur­poses of self-gratification and expres­sion … a search that leaves ruin in its wake in the lives of those around him, like Colum­bia, Eddie, and in many ways (though argu­ments surely would ensue) Brad and Janet.

But the point is not that such a car­toon­ishly deviant, puerile per­son­al­ity should not exist in soci­ety — they do already — but rather whether or not such a char­ac­ter should be given the rights, priv­i­leges and unlim­ited accep­tance that is bestowed upon those mem­bers of soci­ety who make up the cen­ter of the bell-curve — or “the norm.”

Rights are, by def­i­n­i­tion, inalien­able and a given — they are not bestowed by any mor­tal force, nor are they pre­sented or rec­og­nized by oth­ers — I have the right to live … and if some­one seeks to chal­lenge that right, I have the right to defend my right to live with deadly force. Nobody, no mat­ter how self-deluded can state that they have the power to remove that right — they may have the power to dis­re­gard that right, but even in dis­re­gard­ing it and vio­lat­ing it — the right remains intact as some­thing that is part of who I am as a human being. The pur­pose of the Civil Rights move­ment was not so much to “bestow” rights upon an under­rep­re­sented minor­ity, for exam­ple, but rather to rec­og­nize rights that were already present. Such is the nature of rights — they exist apart from the fiat of any human endeavor.

As a result — all of these “deviant” groups, already have the rights that the “norm” has — but likely feel that those rights aren’t rec­og­nized by the norm satisfactorily.

But what of priv­i­leges? Well, priv­i­leges are con­trary to the idea of rights. Priv­i­leges are bestowed by human beings upon each other for the sole pur­pose of enabling greater impact in the world, or by ref­er­ence, lim­it­ing it. For exam­ple, the license to drive is a priv­i­lege, not a right. The state bestows that priv­i­lege, and if a per­son fails to com­ply with the require­ments that the state presents, that priv­i­lege can be revoked.

Of course, there is an entire dia­log and philo­soph­i­cal con­ti­nent of ideas around the jux­ta­po­si­tion of rights and priv­i­leges — but that’s not for this arti­cle. What is impor­tant to note here is sim­ply that we each have rights that can not be with­drawn right­eously, and priv­i­leges that are bestowed and with­drawn accord­ing to the empow­er­ment of soci­ety and the indi­vid­u­als or groups that have greater power over us. In fact, power, in its own sense, is defined by the abil­ity to bestow or remove priv­i­leges – at it’s core.

Then finally, the third thing I’m regard­ing in terms of sta­tis­ti­cal deviants is unlim­ited accep­tance. Herein lies the rub — the goal is to cre­ate a method­ol­ogy by which sta­tis­ti­cal deviance can exist and con­tinue to be accepted by soci­ety — but allow­ing the norm to remain intact; that’s my chal­lenge to everyone.

Well — look­ing at this math­e­mat­i­cally — we can see that out­liers belong on the edges of the curve — that’s their proper place on the curve. How­ever, as any mem­ber of the out­lier com­mu­ni­ties can tell you — it does not feel as if we exist on the sta­tis­ti­cal tail — we con­sider our­selves to be pretty close to “nor­mal” and can prove it by the com­pany we keep. We rec­og­nize in our hearts that “most peo­ple” have at least a ten­dency towards what we hold dear — and in fact, all of our friends are at the very least accept­ing of our point of view, and at the most, mem­bers of that same out­look. So, in our lives at the edge of the curve, we actu­ally exist in a smaller curve, of which, we are the norm.

Thus begins the con­cept of cul­ture war. As the Dr. Franken­furters of the world seek to receive the priv­i­leges of soci­ety that they feel are their rights, they present it as a mea­sure of accep­tance. On the other side of the equa­tion, the “nor­mal” com­mu­nity (the Brads and Janets) seek to be accept­ing, and work to rec­og­nize and assim­i­late the Rocky Hor­ror mind­set … in order to rec­og­nize the rights of the Franken­furter crowd. What results, how­ever, is not an assim­i­lated Franken­furter — but rather, a mod­i­fied Brad and Janet — in essence, a destruc­tion of the norm. But the point of the rest of this arti­cle is that it is not Franken­furter that drove the destruc­tion of the norm — but rather, the desires of Brad and Janet. Franken­furter wanted accep­tance — a noble pur­suit, Brad and Janet are the most deviant destroy­ers of all — it is the norm itself that is moti­vated most darkly — and I would posit that the cur­rent cul­ture wars are not a threat because of the needs of the deviant com­mu­ni­ties — but because of the self­ish desires of the nor­ma­tive pop­u­la­tion, self­ish desires that are given license by the deviant groups.

Gen­er­ally speak­ing, the “norms” of soci­ety reflect the char­ac­ter­is­tics of the largest rep­re­sen­ta­tive group; for exam­ple, I believe, to date, there are more Chi­nese peo­ple than any other single-raced peo­ple group now — so the “norm” for world soci­ety is intrin­si­cally Chi­nese in eth­nic­ity. This is not nec­es­sar­ily man­dat­ing Chi­nese cul­ture is the norm, or that Chi­nese Com­mu­nism is the norm — but rather sim­ply that the genetic lay­out of human­ity trends towards Chi­nese at the cen­ter of the curve.

So, what of sex­u­al­ity? What is the norm there? Well, the norm tends to be man with woman, though that may annoy peo­ple to read — it’s the fact that most rela­tion­ships sta­tis­ti­cally are het­ero­sex­ual — so sta­tis­ti­cally, that’s the norm. But the norm is just a mea­sure of vol­umes, not a moral assess­ment — so read on.

Here’s the issue — what hap­pens to the sta­tis­ti­cal dataset when you seek to move an out­lier to the posi­tion of norm? What hap­pens when you try to “assim­i­late other lifestyles” into every day life? Well, there are only two ways to do that — you either decrease the data set so that the deviant groups are more promi­nent (and get your smaller bell curve as described above that exists on the tail) — or you mod­ify the norm.

So, let’s look at sex­ual sta­tis­ti­cal deviance in a gen­eral sense in rela­tion to this. Deviance, in this sense is any activ­ity that is per­formed by a seg­ment of the total group that is one or more stan­dard devi­a­tions from the norm. That’s “deviant behavior.”

Sta­tis­ti­cally — as sad as this is going to be to say out loud — same sex rela­tion­ships remain sta­tis­ti­cally deviant. Not nec­es­sar­ily morally so (insert entire side­bar about reli­gious ortho­doxy here, of course), but sta­tis­ti­cally off the world­wide norm (side­bar num­ber two — just because it hap­pens a cer­tain way in the US doesn’t actu­ally mean “every­body.” Mar­riage turn­ing into divorce 50% of the time is a US phe­nom­e­non, e.g.).

So, should those rela­tion­ships that are “deviant” be ostra­cized? Likely not — though again, the reli­gious estab­lish­ment would argue against it in terms of actual phys­i­cal behav­ior — but that’s out­side the scope of this article.

But, if we seek to “nor­mal­ize” deviant rela­tion­ships — we either cre­ate an arti­fi­cial sit­u­a­tion that is sta­tis­ti­cally inac­cu­rate (by giv­ing homo­sex­ual head­count a greater weight, for exam­ple, so that it trends towards the cen­ter of the bell curve) — or we mod­ify the norm. Mod­i­fi­ca­tion of the norm results in a broader accep­tance of deviant behav­ior, deviant lifestyles, etc. Basi­cally, we would need to pur­sue a def­i­n­i­tion of “every­body do it.”

Now — here’s the rub. Put down your torch and pitch­fork for a sec­ond (that means you peo­ple on the other side, too) — the point is that if you seek to mod­ify the norm in order to “nor­mal­ize the deviant”; and we see that in order to do that, the norm must be changed … when we get to human behav­ior, we need to begin to inves­ti­gate the moti­va­tions that would bring that change about.

The moti­va­tions for the deviant pop­u­la­tion to want to change are straight­for­ward — things like peace­ful coex­is­tence, more finan­cial ful­fill­ment and self-empowerment. But what are the moti­va­tions for the “empow­ered norm?” Their moti­va­tions likely aren’t to become more like the dis­em­pow­ered com­mu­ni­ties directly — but rather to pur­sue sec­ondary causes like a sense of pos­i­tive self-righteousness (“I’m a fair per­son, I treat every­one equally”), or to pur­sue a higher ideal of self­less equa­nim­ity in pur­suit of a greater over­all population.

So, back to Rocky Hor­ror, homo­sex­u­al­ity, and gen­eral sex­ual “devi­a­tions” from the norm. The call to arms in the “lib­eral” point of view is to “nor­mal­ize” the homo­sex­ual lifestyle, to allow that this out­lier is actu­ally just a part of the norm. The real­ity, sta­tis­ti­cally, is that this group — how­ever good or bad — is not a sub­sec­tion of the norm, but an out­lier. In order to be incor­po­rated into the norm, the norm must change — for the norm to change, it must be moti­vated to change.

In this con­text, the dan­ger that the Christian/Conservative/Orthodox right fears is pri­mar­ily the effect this nor­mal­iza­tion would have on the exist­ing mem­bers of the nor­ma­tive pop­u­la­tion. Because one of the sec­ondary moti­va­tions that the norm expe­ri­ences and pur­sues, as evi­denced in the loos­en­ing of the moral fab­ric towards sex­ual inter­ac­tion over the last 40 years, is one of licen­tious­ness. The norm wants to play, the deviants want to belong. Well — if we let you belong, we get to exist in a deviant state our­selves. But we exist in that deviant state for self­ish desires, not because of pre-existing con­di­tions (genet­ics, early child­hood, etc.) like “true” mem­bers of the deviant com­mu­nity. Brad and Janet don’t actu­ally want to help Franken­furter “get nor­mal” — they want to USE Franken­furter to give them­selves the room to get wild.

You see — gay peo­ple, trans­gen­der peo­ple, polyg­a­mists, celi­bates, fur­ries — any group that is not a part of the norm — have a gen­eral moti­va­tion (loosely speak­ing) of pur­suit of accep­tance. All peo­ple wish to be free of being ostra­cized, being pushed out, being per­se­cuted. The moti­va­tions of these groups are all valid and rea­son­able — there is not rea­son any­body should be asked to accept his or her own exclu­sion from the sta­tus quo, it’s unfair — no mat­ter the sit­u­a­tion (espe­cially when such exclu­sion involves priv­i­leges like spousal rights, etc.).

What’s the threat though is not that such peo­ple, who are not “deviant by choice”, are seek­ing inclu­sion — but what moti­va­tions the “nor­ma­tive” pop­u­la­tion would poten­tially have for seek­ing to devi­ate from the norm in order to assim­i­late these groups more read­ily, and thus rede­fine the norm. The dan­ger is that the pri­mary moti­va­tion is for a more per­son­ally self-indulgent pur­suit of sex­ual deviance by exist­ing mem­bers of the norm — a self-indulgent pur­suit that is not moti­vated by genet­ics, or pre­dis­po­si­tions, or even nur­ture — but by self-desire … by a desire to pur­sue more alter­na­tives by oth­er­wise “nor­ma­tive” persons.

Well — if that is the case — so what?

Y’see, if that is the case, then as the major­ity of the pop­u­la­tion pur­sues change based on self-indulgent desires masked as accep­tance — then gen­eral sex­ual expres­sion becomes one of self-indulgence rather than one of lov­ing com­mit­ment. In this nation, soci­etal inti­macy is becom­ing more and more about “hook­ing up”, and much less about falling in love WITHOUT SEX in order to pur­sue deeper, bind­ing com­mit­ments first in the form of marriage.

No, I’m not imply­ing that sex­u­ally dif­fer­ent peo­ple aren’t com­mit­ted — I’m indi­cat­ing that those who move from the norm inten­tion­ally, based upon a desire for more sex­ual free­dom, tend to do so for self­ish rea­sons — and those self­ish rea­sons tend to degrade the fab­ric of sex­ual inter­ac­tion between peo­ple uni­ver­sally — since a pop­u­la­tion that is made up of self-indulgent peo­ple tends to breed self-indulgent behavior.

So, what’s the point? The point is — per­haps instead of seek­ing to “become one” with the devi­a­tions in behav­ior in order to show an open-mindedness — we need to rec­og­nize these extended pop­u­la­tions for who they are, give them room to live their lives — ask them to rec­og­nize the pro­tec­tions we place on our­selves in order to keep our­selves in check — and co-exist.

Rocky Hor­ror is about tak­ing “nor­mals” and turn­ing them into “deviants” — and cel­e­brat­ing the expe­ri­ence. Why did they change? Not because, like Franken­furter, they found them­selves trapped on an alien world that didn’t under­stand them — but because they chose to “swim the warm waters of sins of the flesh.”

Instead of destroy­ing Fanken­furter or leav­ing him trapped in the Franken­stein place for his life­time — per­haps we can allow him to exist as he is — as a dif­fer­ent mem­ber of soci­ety. But he must also respect what we are — which is not always the case with deviants. Either from pain, or gen­eral frus­tra­tion, many deviants stride upon a point of view that the nor­mal out­look is some­how dam­aged. The use of lan­guage to describe the most “nor­mal” point of view tends to lean towards neg­a­tives (patri­ar­chal, lin­ear, stag­nant, cramped, lim­ited). The deviants need to be will­ing to be deviant — not seek to change the norm.

Yes, of course, this applies to mar­riage in my opin­ion. There is not rea­son that a sep­a­rate bond should be made avail­able for those of the same sex who seek to com­mit and receive priv­i­leges equiv­a­lent to those of het­ero­sex­ual spouses. But to mod­ify “mar­riage” is to change the norm, and thus under­mine the sta­bil­ity of the norm as a whole.

While fail­ing to rec­og­nize rights is a flaw — destruc­tion of the exist­ing tra­di­tions for the sake of assim­i­la­tion will not suc­ceed — and over time the fail­ings of the com­mu­nity to assim­i­late will con­tinue to pre­vail and a back­lash will ensue — one that might man­i­fest in greater polar­iza­tion between the com­mu­ni­ties — once the nor­mal pop­u­la­tion real­izes that it is los­ing its own identity.

We already see this man­i­fest­ing in a world view as most nations look at the US and other indus­tri­al­ized nations as deca­dent, self-indulgent and ready for collapse.

It would be sad to find that in the hopes of become one great melt­ing pot of sex­ual expres­sion, we find our­selves destroy­ing the very thing that made that melt­ing pot pos­si­ble. An unchang­ing nor­ma­tive center.

Herein lies the threat — but who can do any­thing about it? Are we to await the arrival of Riffraff and his sis­ter before we real­ize that sex­ual deviance must have its lim­its? Are we to throw away the orig­i­nal Brad and Janet in exchange for the more self­ish (and less inter­est­ing) final ver­sions? Sure hope not.

  • Share/Bookmark
Filed under: General No Comments
7Jun/100

Popular

I’m train­ing Angie for her audi­tion for the play Annie. She’s singing the song Pop­u­lar from the Broad­way play, Wicked. It’s a pretty fun piece, and all about one char­ac­ter teach­ing another char­ac­ter how to be pop­u­lar — or more accu­rately — one char­ac­ter promis­ing to teach another char­ac­ter how to be popular.

I keep think­ing of the song as my theme song for the voice train­ing. I’m try­ing to teach these peo­ple (Angie, her friend Mad­die, and a young woman named Kayla) how to be Pop­u­lar. I’m the char­ac­ter in the play who is just a lit­tle too full of her­self and is teach­ing peo­ple how to sing, dance and so forth. Is that bad? Am I a bad per­son for think­ing that way? :D

Mean­while, I’m also think­ing about what it means to be pop­u­lar — and isn’t that what we’re all really striv­ing for after we’ve reached sta­sis on our food, drink, and shel­ter require­ments? We want to be accepted, a “part of” and well … popular.

Is it a bad thing to make that a goal? Can a per­son actu­ally con­sciously strive to be pop­u­lar, to “col­lect” friends for the sole pur­pose of hav­ing a lot of friends? Is that the act of an ado­les­cent who never escaped high schoool?

I know that, on one level, it’s just called “sales” in busi­ness. The pop­u­lar kids are all in sales and mar­ket­ing — which is likely one of the rea­sons that I like work­ing with Nike, even though I hate work­ing with Nike.

When I work with Nike, I’m the geeky kid who’s been invited to the keg­ger because he knows how to run the dig­i­tal keg freezer. I’m not actu­ally a part of the whole thing, but I’m there all the same — and if I’m lucky, maybe a cool kid will talk to me?

But iron­i­cally, at the same time, I AM the cool kid, because I know more about all this applied tech than the peo­ple around me — and that’s why I’ve been called in — so on one level, I’m just some over-the-hill fogey who’s there to make some­thing work — but on another level, I’m a 12-level arch-mage, and all the geeks shud­der at the roll of my dice.

S’funny — on the pop­u­lar line, maybe that’s one of the rea­sons that the growth in our mar­ket gets lim­ited — the mar­ket of colo­ca­tion and inter­net is pri­mar­ily peo­pled with “uncool” kids — who don’t know how to throw par­ties or even invite other kids over to their house (I never invited any­body over to my house grow­ing up — isn’t that sad? Aww…). So, since the mar­ket is so filled with social dis­con­nects, there’s not real way to reach out and get “pop­u­lar” with them — so the growth keeps cer­tain limits.

But what about other things — for exam­ple — I want to be pop­u­lar with my kids — but know that, on some level, I can’t — and that’s sad. They’re the ulti­mate cool kids in my life and they’ll shun me on occa­sion because well — I’mDad. Sad.

So — are YOU pop­u­lar? Can I, a la Face­book, peruse your rela­tion­ships and add them to mine? Can you help me become more known and wanted through­out the entire known human race so I become the most pop­u­lar per­son in the world?

Who is the most pop­u­lar per­son in the world? That’s an inter­est­ing question.

I don’t know that I’d want to be that pop­u­lar, lots of pres­sure. Maybe I’ll stay a geek for a few more days.

  • Share/Bookmark
Filed under: Geek, General No Comments